Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33864555›Full record

ReviewJournal of autism and developmental disorders2021

Epidemiological surveys of ASD: advances and remaining challenges.

Eric Fombonne, Heather MacFarlane, Alexandra C Salem

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Memantine for autism spectrum disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Epidemiology of Autism Spectrum Disorders in French Children Aged 8.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric FombonneDepartment of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail code: GH254 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. fombonne@ohsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8605-3538
Heather MacFarlaneDepartment of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail code: GH254 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Alexandra C SalemDepartment of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail code: GH254 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent worldwide epidemiological surveys of autism conducted in 37 countries are reviewed; the median prevalence of autism is .97% in 26 high-income countries. Methodological advances and remaining challenges in designing and executing surveys are discussed, including the effects on prevalence of variable case definitions and nosography, of reliance on parental reports only, case ascertainment through mainstream school surveys, innovative approaches to screen school samples more efficiently, and consideration of age in interpreting surveys. Directions for the future of autism epidemiology are discussed, including the need to systematically examine cross-cultural variation in phenotypic expression and developing surveillance programs.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderHumansParentsPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesAutismCultureEpidemiologyPrevalenceScreeningSex ratio

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.