ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2021
Effect of mangrove restoration on sediment properties and bacterial community.
Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial Influence on Carbon Storage and Trace Element Speciation in Restored and Natural Mangrove Sediments: A Synthesis of the Current Understanding.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Differential enrichment of key bacterial taxa in the rhizosphere of naturally growing and artificially restored Kandelia obovata forests.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Shifts in Soil Fungal Community and Trophic Modes During Mangrove Ecosystem Restoration.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Seasonal dynamics of bacterial communities in mangrove sediments of Shupaisha island, Zhejiang Province, China.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Characterization of microbiome diversity unveils substantial microbial variation in mangrove soil sediments from coastal regions of Malaysia.Access microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Bacterial Community Structure and Environmental Driving Factors in the Surface Sediments of Six Mangrove Sites from Guangxi, China.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Bacterial Communities across Multiple Ecological Niches (Water, Sediment, Plastic, and Snail Gut) in Mangrove Habitats.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Do restoration strategies in mangroves recover microbial diversity? A case study in the Yucatan peninsula.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mangrove reconstruction is an efficient approach for mangrove conservation and restoration. The present study aimed to explore the effects of mangrove reconstruction on sediment properties and bacterial community. The results showed that mangrove restoration greatly promoted sediment fertility, whereas the improvements were more obvious induced by Kandelia obovata when compared to Avicennia marina. In all the samples, the dominant top5 bacterial group were Proteobacteria (48.31-54.52%), Planctomycetes (5.98-8.48%), Bacteroidetes (4.49-11.14%) and Acidobacteria (5.69-8.16%). As for the differences among the groups, the relative abundance of Chloroflexi was higher in the sediments of K. obovata, while Bacteroidetes was more abundant in A. marina group. Furthermore, the two bacterial genera (Rhodoplanes and Novosphingobium) were more dominant in the sediments of K. obovata, while the sediments of A. marina contained higher abundance of Vibrio and Marinobacterium. Besides, bacterial community was highly correlated with mangrove species and sediment property and nutrient status. The results of this study would provide a better understanding of the ecological benefits of mangroves and highlighted the information on biogeochemical processes driven by mangrove restoration and microorganisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33864552What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.