ArticleMedical molecular morphology2021
Immunohistochemical localization and pharmacokinetics of the anti-MRSA drug teicoplanin in rat kidney using a newly developed specific antibody.
Article in Medical molecular morphology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of immunohistochemistry for detecting fluvoxamine in rat tissues using newly prepared monoclonal antibody: its precise localization in small intestine, kidney, and liver of rats.Medical molecular morphology · 2023Article
- Immunohistochemical Localization of Alogliptin, a DPP-4 Inhibitor, in Tissues of Normal and Type 2 Diabetes Model Rat.Acta histochemica et cytochemica · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We prepared a polyclonal antibody against a teicoplanin (TEIC)-bovine serum albumin conjugate that was specific to both conjugated and free forms of TEIC. We demonstrated that this antibody could be used to detect the time-dependent localization of TEIC in rat kidneys. Immunohistochemistry revealed immunoreactivity specifically in the microvilli and apical cytoplasm of epithelial cells in proximal tubule segments S1 and S2, 1 h after intravenous TEIC injection, with higher staining intensity in the S2 segments. The epithelial cells of S3 segments showed moderate immunostaining with a few cells exhibiting nuclear staining. Furthermore, we found that the distal tubules and collecting ducts contained both TEIC-positive and -negative cells. TEIC immunoreactivity decreased rapidly over time; only weak staining remained in the S3 segments, distal tubules, and collecting ducts 24 h after administration. No staining was detected 7 days after injection. These results were significantly different from those of our previous study obtained using vancomycin, which showed moderate staining in the proximal tubule segments S1 and S2, distal tubules, and the collecting ducts 8 days after administration. The lower TEIC accumulation in tissues may account for a lower risk of adverse events compared to that using vancomycin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.