Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33864492›Full record

ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2021

Microscale Thermophoresis and additional effects measured in NanoTemper Monolith instruments.

Blanca López-Méndez, Stephan Uebel, Li Peng Lundgren, Arthur Sedivy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. eSPC: an online data-analysis platform for molecular biophysics.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Blanca López-MéndezBiophysics Platform, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8541-4904
Stephan UebelBioorganic Chemistry and Biophysics Core, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, Martinsried, 82152, Planegg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3726-3942
Li Peng LundgrenBiophysics Platform, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Arthur SedivyProteinTechnology, Vienna Biocenter Core Facilities GmbH, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, 1030, Vienna, Austria. arthur.sedivy@vbcf.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5729-9790

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NanoTemper Monolith instruments have gained enormous popularity for measuring molecular interactions both in academia and industry. The underlying technology has been extensively reviewed along with its assumptions, limitations, and applications (Scheuermann et al., Anal Biochem 496:79-93, 2016). Several assumptions about the technique such as the extent of thermal deviations generated by the infrared laser and the thermophoretic foundation of the measured signal have been revised during the last decade. We present here in this letter the experience gathered in scientific service facilities about this technique and make scientists aware of possible pitfalls with the intention to promote knowledge and good practice throughout the scientific community.

Indexed as

Biophysical PhenomenaInteractionK DMSTThermophoresisTRIC

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.