Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33864466›Full record

Trial reportTranslational behavioral medicine2021

Implementation of a workplace physical activity intervention in child care: process evaluation results from the Care2BWell trial.

Cody D Neshteruk, Erik Willis, Falon Smith, Amber E Vaughn, Anna H Grummon, Maihan B Vu, Dianne S Ward, Laura Linnan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational behavioral medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cody D NeshterukDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0516-6873
Erik WillisCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Falon SmithCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Amber E VaughnCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1249-6405
Anna H GrummonCenter for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8705-038X
Maihan B VuCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Dianne S WardCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Laura LinnanDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Venkata Saroja Voruganti · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
Care2bWell: A Worksite Physical Activity & Wellness Program for Child Care StaffR01HL119568 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LINNAN, LAURA A, WARD, DIANNE STANTON · 2014 to 2018
$3.7M
ACL HHS U48DP005017CDC HHS U48-DP005017NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005017NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL119568NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL 119568NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350NIH HHS P30-DK056350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Care2BWell was designed to evaluate the efficacy of Healthy Lifestyles (HL), a worksite health promotion intervention to increase child care workers' physical activity. The purpose of this study was to use process evaluation to describe the implementation of HL and determine if different levels of implementation are associated with changes in workers' physical activity. Data were collected from 250 workers randomized to HL, a 6 month, multilevel intervention that included an educational workshop followed by three 8 week campaigns that included self-monitoring and feedback, raffle incentive, social support, and center director coaching. Process evaluation data collection included direct observation, self-reported evaluation surveys, website analytics and user test account data, tracking databases and semi-structured interviews. Implementation scores were calculated for each intervention component and compared at the center and individual levels. Nearly a third of workers never self-monitored and few (16%) met self-monitoring goals. Only 39% of centers engaged with the social support component as intended. Raffle and social support components were perceived as the least useful. Implementation varied widely by center (25%-76%) and individual workers (0%-94%). No within- or between-group differences for high compared to low implementation groups for change in physical activity were evident. Interview themes included limited sustainability, competing priorities, importance of social support, and desire for a more intensive, personalized intervention. Wide variation in implementation may explain limited effects on intervention outcomes. Future worksite interventions designed for child care workers can use these findings to optimize health promotion in this setting.

Indexed as

Child CareWorkplaceChildExerciseHealth PromotionHealthy LifestyleHumansChild carePhysical activityProcess evaluationWorkplace health promotion

Identifiers

PMID33864466
PMCPMC8320876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.