ArticleInternational ophthalmology2021
Crystalline gene mutations in Turkish children with congenital cataracts.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Case Report: AFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo detect crystallin gene mutations in Turkish children with congenital cataracts.
methodsThe present study included 56 children (38 males and 18 females) who were diagnosed with congenital cataract in our ophthalmology clinic. The patients' blood samples were collected and sent to the medical genetics laboratory. The samples were assessed using the sequence analysis method, which covered all exons of CRYAA, CRYAB, CRYBB1, CRYBB2, CRYBB3, CRYGC and CRYGD.
resultsIn total, 56 patients with congenital cataracts were included in the present study. Of these, 68% were male and 32% were female. The age range of the patients was 2 months to 5 years. The mean age of onset was 21.08 ± 15.15 months. All the patients had bilateral congenital cataracts. The female-to-male ratio was 1:2.1. Mutation analysis was performed to detect possible mutations in CRYAA, CRYAB, CRYBB1, CRYBB2, CRYBB3, CRYGC and CRYGD. Of the four mutations detected, one was novel (c.383A > T in CRYGD) and three were known (c.592C > T in CRYBB2, c.164A > G in CRYGC and c.592C > T in CRYBB2). Two of these three mutations were detected in the same gene (CRYBB2). Crystallin gene mutations were detected in 7% of patients with congenital cataracts (four out of 56 patients) in the present study.
conclusionsWe think that mutations in crystallin genes are responsible for 7% of congenital cataract cases in our country. The detection of these mutations may help in the molecular diagnosis of congenital cataracts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.