Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33864174›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2021

Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter-comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay.

Nora Kováts, Katalin Hubai, Tsend-Ayush Sainnokhoi, András Hoffer, Gábor Teke

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nora KovátsInstitute of Environmental Sciences, University of Pannonia, Egyetem str. 10, Veszprém, 8200, Hungary. kovats@almos.uni-pannon.hu.
Katalin HubaiInstitute of Environmental Sciences, University of Pannonia, Egyetem str. 10, Veszprém, 8200, Hungary.
Tsend-Ayush SainnokhoiInstitute of Environmental Sciences, University of Pannonia, Egyetem str. 10, Veszprém, 8200, Hungary.
András HofferMTA-PE Air Chemistry Research Group, Egyetem str. 10, Veszprém, 8200, Hungary.
Gábor TekeELGOSCAR-2000 Environmental Technology and Water Management Ltd., Balatonfuzfo, 8184, Hungary.
University of Pannonia · HUWater Resources Research Centre · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bioassay based on the bioluminescence inhibition of the marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri has been the most widely used test for the assessment of airborne particulate matter ecotoxicity. Most studies available use an extract of the solid sample, either made with water or organic solvents. As an alternative, a whole-aerosol test is also available where test bacteria are in actual contact with contaminated particles. In our study, different extraction procedures were compared to this direct contact test based on the V. fischeri assay and analytical measurements. The lowest PAH content and the highest EC

Indexed as

Aliivibrio fischeriParticulate MatterAerosolsBiological AssayToxicity TestsAerosolsParticulate MatterAirborne particulate matterDiesel exhaustDirect contact testVibrio fischeri

Identifiers

PMID33864174
PMCPMC8528798
OpenAlexW3154320638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.