Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33864164›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2021

The development and initial validation of the Breast Cancer Recurrence instrument (BreastCaRe)-a patient-reported outcome measure for detecting symptoms of recurrence after breast cancer.

Beverley Lim Høeg, Lena Saltbæk, Karl Bang Christensen, Randi Valbjørn Karlsen, Christoffer Johansen, Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton, Antonia Bennett, Pernille Envold Bidstrup

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Understanding data visualization techniques in qualitative studies used to develop and validate patient-reported outcome measures: a targeted literature review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Beverley Lim HøegPsychological Aspects of Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. bevlim@cancer.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9946-2429
Lena SaltbækSurvivorship and Inequality in Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karl Bang ChristensenDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Randi Valbjørn KarlsenPsychological Aspects of Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christoffer JohansenPsychological Aspects of Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Susanne Oksbjerg DaltonSurvivorship and Inequality in Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Antonia BennettCancer Outcomes Research Program, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Pernille Envold BidstrupPsychological Aspects of Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient-reported outomes (PRO) may facilitate prompt treatment. We describe the development and psychometric properties of the first instrument to monitor for symptoms of breast cancer (BC) recurrence.

methodsThis study is nested in the MyHealth randomized trial of nurse-led follow-up based on electronically-collected PROs. We constructed items assessing symptoms of potential recurrence through expert interviews with six BC specialists in Denmark. Semi-structured cognitive interviews were carried out with a patient panel to assess acceptability and comprehensibility. Items were subsequently tested in a population of 1170 women 1-10 years after completing BC treatment. We carried out multiple-groups confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis to test dimensionality, local dependence (LD) and differential item functioning (DIF) according to sociodemographic and treatment-related factors. Clinical data was obtained from the Danish Breast Cancer Group registry.

resultsTwenty-two items were generated for the Breast Cancer Recurrence instrument (BreastCaRe). Cognitive testing resulted in clearer items. Seven subscales based on general, bone, liver, lung, brain, locoregional and contralateral recurrence symptoms were proposed. Both CFA and Rasch models confirmed the factor structure. No DIF was identified. Five item pairs showed LD but all items were retained to avoid loss of clinical information. Rasch models taking LD into account were used to generate a standardized scoring table for each subscale.

conclusionsThe BreastCaRe has good content and structural validity, patient acceptability and measurement invariance. We are preparing to examine the predictive validity of this new instrument.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesBreast cancer follow-upMultiple groups factor analysisPatient-reported outcomeRasch modelsRecurrence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.