Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33864139›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Noninvasive prediction of residual disease for advanced high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma by MRI-based radiomic-clinical nomogram.

Haiming Li, Rui Zhang, Ruimin Li, Wei Xia, Xiaojun Chen, Jiayi Zhang, Songqi Cai, Yong'ai Li, Shuhui Zhao, Jinwei Qiang and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. CT-based radiomics model to predict platinum sensitivity in epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a multicentre study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Artificial Intelligence in Obstetric and Gynecological MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Cancer medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Haiming LiDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Rui ZhangSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, 215163, China.
Ruimin LiDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Wei XiaSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, 215163, China.
Xiaojun ChenDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Jiayi ZhangSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, 215163, China.
Songqi CaiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Yong'ai LiDepartment of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201508, China.
Shuhui ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Jinwei QiangDepartment of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201508, China.
Weijun PengDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Yajia GuDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China. cjr.guyajia@vip.163.com.
Xin GaoSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, 215163, China. xingaosam@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9906-0596

Funding

Chinese Academy of Sciences-Iranian Vice Presidency for Science and Technology Silk Road Science Fund GJHZ1857Imaging Foundation of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center YX201803National Natural Science Foundations of China 81901704Shanghai Health and Family Planning CommissionYouth Fund Project 20194Y0489Shanghai Municipal Commission of Science and Technology 19411972000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a preoperative MRI-based radiomic-clinical nomogram for prediction of residual disease (RD) in patients with advanced high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC).

methodsIn total, 217 patients with advanced HGSOC were enrolled from January 2014 to June 2019 and randomly divided into a training set (n = 160) and a validation set (n = 57). Finally, 841 radiomic features were extracted from each tumor on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI) sequence, respectively. We used two fusion methods, the maximal volume of interest (MV) and the maximal feature value (MF), to fuse the radiomic features of bilateral tumors, so that patients with bilateral tumors have the same kind of radiomic features as patients with unilateral tumors. The radiomic signatures were constructed by using mRMR method and LASSO classifier. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to develop a radiomic-clinical nomogram incorporating radiomic signature and conventional clinico-radiological features. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated on the validation set.

resultsIn total, 342 tumors from 217 patients were analyzed in this study. The MF-based radiomic signature showed significantly better prediction performance than the MV-based radiomic signature (AUC = 0.744 vs. 0.650, p = 0.047). By incorporating clinico-radiological features and MF-based radiomic signature, radiomic-clinical nomogram showed favorable prediction ability with an AUC of 0.803 in the validation set, which was significantly higher than that of clinico-radiological signature and MF-based radiomic signature (AUC = 0.623, 0.744, respectively).

conclusionsThe proposed MRI-based radiomic-clinical nomogram provides a promising way to noninvasively predict the RD status. KEY POINTS: • MRI-based radiomic-clinical nomogram is feasible to noninvasively predict residual disease in patients with advanced HGSOC. • The radiomic signature based on MF showed significantly better prediction performance than that based on MV. • The radiomic-clinical nomogram showed a favorable prediction ability with an AUC of 0.803.

Indexed as

NomogramsOvarian NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm, ResidualRetrospective StudiesMagnetic resonance imagingNomogramOvarian neoplasmsRadiomicsResidual disease

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.