Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33864072›Full record

ArticleGenetics2021

Genomic prediction of hybrid crops allows disentangling dominance and epistasis.

David González-Diéguez, Andrés Legarra, Alain Charcosset, Laurence Moreau, Christina Lehermeier, Simon Teyssèdre, Zulma G Vitezica

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Improving hybrid breeding efficiency in winter oilseed rape under sparse multi-environment testing.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Portability of genomic predictions trained on sparse factorial designs across two maize silage breeding cycles.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genomic Prediction: Progress and Perspectives for Rice Improvement.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David González-DiéguezINRAE, INP, UMR 1388 GenPhySE, F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8637-1835
Andrés LegarraINRAE, INP, UMR 1388 GenPhySE, F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Alain CharcossetGQE-Le Moulon, INRAE, Univ. Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Laurence MoreauGQE-Le Moulon, INRAE, Univ. Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Christina LehermeierGenetics and Analytics Unit, RAGT2n, Druelle, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7724-0887
Simon TeyssèdreGenetics and Analytics Unit, RAGT2n, Druelle, France.
Zulma G VitezicaINRAE, INP, UMR 1388 GenPhySE, F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3162-7258
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We revisited, in a genomic context, the theory of hybrid genetic evaluation models of hybrid crosses of pure lines, as the current practice is largely based on infinitesimal model assumptions. Expressions for covariances between hybrids due to additive substitution effects and dominance and epistatic deviations were analytically derived. Using dense markers in a GBLUP analysis, it is possible to split specific combining ability into dominance and across-groups epistatic deviations, and to split general combining ability (GCA) into within-line additive effects and within-line additive by additive (and higher order) epistatic deviations. We analyzed a publicly available maize data set of Dent × Flint hybrids using our new model (called GCA-model) up to additive by additive epistasis. To model higher order interactions within GCAs, we also fitted "residual genetic" line effects. Our new GCA-model was compared with another genomic model which assumes a uniquely defined effect of genes across origins. Most variation in hybrids is accounted by GCA. Variances due to dominance and epistasis have similar magnitudes. Models based on defining effects either differently or identically across heterotic groups resulted in similar predictive abilities for hybrids. The currently used model inflates the estimated additive genetic variance. This is not important for hybrid predictions but has consequences for the breeding scheme-e.g. overestimation of the genetic gain within heterotic group. Therefore, we recommend using GCA-model, which is appropriate for genomic prediction and variance component estimation in hybrid crops using genomic data, and whose results can be practically interpreted and used for breeding purposes.

Indexed as

ChimeraCrops, AgriculturalEpistasis, GeneticForecastingGenetic VariationGenomicsHybridization, GeneticInbreedingLinkage DisequilibriumModels, GeneticPlant BreedingPlantsdominanceepistasisgenetic variancegenomic modelsgenomic predictionGenPredheterosisshared data resources

Identifiers

PMID33864072
PMCPMC8128411
OpenAlexW3131909824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.