Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33863949›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Microscale sensor solution for data collection from fibre-matrix interfaces.

Royson Dsouza, Paulo Antunes, Markus Kakkonen, Olli Tanhuanpää, Pekka Laurikainen, Farzin Javanshour, Pasi Kallio, Mikko Kanerva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Royson DsouzaFaculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Tampere University, PO Box 589, 33014, Tampere, Finland. royson.dsouza@tuni.fi.
Paulo AntunesInstituto de Telecomunicações, PO Box 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
Markus KakkonenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, PO Box 589, 33014, Tampere, Finland.
Olli TanhuanpääFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, PO Box 589, 33014, Tampere, Finland.
Pekka LaurikainenFaculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Tampere University, PO Box 589, 33014, Tampere, Finland.
Farzin JavanshourFaculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Tampere University, PO Box 589, 33014, Tampere, Finland.
Pasi KallioFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, PO Box 589, 33014, Tampere, Finland.
Mikko KanervaFaculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Tampere University, PO Box 589, 33014, Tampere, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Especially the applications of fibrous composites in miniature products, dental and other medical applications require accurate data of microscale mechanics. The characterization of adhesion between single filament and picoliter-scale polymer matrix usually relies on the experiments using so-called microbond (MB) testing. The traditional MB test systems provide unitary data output (i.e., converted force) which is enigmatic in resolving the fracture parameters of multi-mode interface cracks. As a fundamental basis, the momentary reaction force and respective local strain at the location of a non-ambiguous gradient are needed for a mechanical analysis. In this paper, a monolithic compliant based structure with an integrated Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensor is developed and analysed. The stiffness of the compliant structure is estimated by using mathematical and finite element (FE) models. Qualification experiments are carried out to confirm the functional performance: MB testing of synthetic (carbon and glass) and natural (flax) single filaments are successfully performed. Quasi-static and dynamic analysis of the MB testing is carried out by using the FE method to interpret the response of the compliant structure. The developed strain-sensing CBPM-FBG holder shows excellent sensitivity during the MB tests for both synthetic and natural filaments, even at a low filament diameters as low as [Formula: see text], making the monolithic compliant structure the first instrument capable of force-strain data output for bonded filament-droplet specimens.

Identifiers

PMID33863949
PMCPMC8052447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.