Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33863917›Full record

ArticleScientific data2021

LoDoPaB-CT, a benchmark dataset for low-dose computed tomography reconstruction.

Johannes Leuschner, Maximilian Schmidt, Daniel Otero Baguer, Peter Maass

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. FMDNet: Spatial-frequency feature routing for low-dose CT denoising.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Exploring connections of spectral analysis and transfer learning in medical imaging.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johannes Leuschner *Center for Industrial Mathematics, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstr. 5, 28359, Bremen, Germany. jleuschn@uni-bremen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7361-9523
Maximilian Schmidt *Center for Industrial Mathematics, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstr. 5, 28359, Bremen, Germany. maximilian.schmidt@uni-bremen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8710-1389
Daniel Otero BaguerCenter for Industrial Mathematics, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstr. 5, 28359, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6550-6043
Peter MaassCenter for Industrial Mathematics, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstr. 5, 28359, Bremen, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) GRK 2224/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning approaches for tomographic image reconstruction have become very effective and have been demonstrated to be competitive in the field. Comparing these approaches is a challenging task as they rely to a great extent on the data and setup used for training. With the Low-Dose Parallel Beam (LoDoPaB)-CT dataset, we provide a comprehensive, open-access database of computed tomography images and simulated low photon count measurements. It is suitable for training and comparing deep learning methods as well as classical reconstruction approaches. The dataset contains over 40000 scan slices from around 800 patients selected from the LIDC/IDRI database. The data selection and simulation setup are described in detail, and the generating script is publicly accessible. In addition, we provide a Python library for simplified access to the dataset and an online reconstruction challenge. Furthermore, the dataset can also be used for transfer learning as well as sparse and limited-angle reconstruction scenarios.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedDeep LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiation Dosage

Identifiers

PMID33863917
PMCPMC8052416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.