Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33863865›Full record

ArticlePain2022

Patient outcomes after opioid dose reduction among patients with chronic opioid therapy.

Sara E Hallvik, Sanae El Ibrahimi, Kirbee Johnston, Jonah Geddes, Gillian Leichtling, P Todd Korthuis, Daniel M Hartung

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States, 2022.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2022
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trends in acupuncture billing by a large commercial insurer.The American journal of managed care · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Development of the barriers to opioid access scale among individuals with chronic pain.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sara E HallvikComagine Health, Research & Evaluation Department, Portland, OR, United States.
Sanae El IbrahimiComagine Health, Research & Evaluation Department, Portland, OR, United States.
Kirbee JohnstonOregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University College of Pharmacy, Portland, OR, United States.
Jonah GeddesOregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University College of Pharmacy, Portland, OR, United States.
Gillian LeichtlingComagine Health, Research & Evaluation Department, Portland, OR, United States.
P Todd KorthuisOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Daniel M HartungOregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University College of Pharmacy, Portland, OR, United States.
Oregon State University · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas · US

Funding

Western States Node of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials NetworkU10DA015815 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MCCARTY, DENNIS, SORENSEN, JAMES L · 2002 to 2015
$25.2M
Western States Node of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (TMS for CUD) UG1DA015815 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Keith N. Humphreys, Philip Todd Korthuis · 2015 to 2026
$24.6M
Oregon HIV/Hepatitis and Opioid Prevention and Engagement (OR-HOPE) StudyUG3DA044831 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KORTHUIS, PHILIP TODD · 2017 to 2018
$895k
ACL HHS U01CE002786NCIPC CDC HHS U01 CE002786NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA015815NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA015815NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA044831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractThe net effects of prescribing initiatives that encourage dose reductions are uncertain. We examined whether rapid dose reduction after high-dose chronic opioid therapy (COT) associates with suicide, overdose, or other opioid-related adverse events. This retrospective cohort study included Oregon Medicaid recipients with high-dose COT. Claims were linked with prescription data from the prescription drug monitoring program and death data from vital statistics, 2014 to 2017. Participants were placed into 4 mutually exclusive dose trajectory groups after the high-dose COT period, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the effect of dose changes on patient outcomes in the following year. Of the 14,596 high-dose COT patients, 4191 (28.7%) abruptly discontinued opioid prescriptions, 1648 (11.3%) reduced opioid dose before discontinuing, 6480 (44.4%) had a dose reduction but never discontinued, and 2277 (15.6%) had a stable or increasing dose. Discontinuation, whether abrupt (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-9.25) or with dose reduction (aHR 4.47, 95% CI 1.68-11.88) significantly increased risk of suicide compared with those with stable or increasing dose. By contrast, discontinuation or dose reduction reduced the risk of overdose compared with those with a stable or increasing dose (aHR 0.36-0.62, 95% CI 0.20-0.94). Patients with an abrupt discontinuation were more likely to overdose on heroin (vs. prescription opioids) than patients in other groups (P < 0.0001). Our study suggests that patients on COT require careful risk assessment and supportive interventions when considering opioid discontinuation or continuation at a high dose.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersPrescription Drug Monitoring ProgramsAnalgesics, OpioidDrug TaperingHumansRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID33863865
PMCPMC8494834
OpenAlexW3155757643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.