ArticleJournal of nursing measurement2021
Reliability and Validity Testing of the Quantified Quality of Interaction Schedule.
Article in Journal of nursing measurement, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Racial differences in the quality of care interactions among nursing home residents with dementia.Ethnicity & health · 2025Trial
- A Description of Staff-resident Interactions in Assisted Living.Clinical nursing research · 2021Trial
- Testing the Impact of FFC-AL-EIT on Psychosocial and Behavioral Outcomes in Assisted Living.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021Trial
- Factors associated with eating performance in nursing home residents living with dementia and other comorbidities.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Differences in Staff-Resident Care Interactions by Nursing Home Racial Composition: a Preliminary Analysis.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2024Article
- The association between patient engagement and quality of care interactions among acute care patients with dementia.Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.)Article
- Clinical factors associated with the quality of interactions between staff and hospitalized older patients with dementia.Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.)Article
- Gender differences in interactions and depressive symptoms among hospitalized older patients living with dementia.Journal of women & agingArticle
- Factors Associated With the Quality of Staff-Resident Interactions in Assisted Living.Journal of nursing care qualityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeThe purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Quality of Interactions Schedule (QuIS) using a quantification scoring approach.
methodsBaseline data from the Evidence Integration Triangle for Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (EIT-4-BPSD) study was used.
resultsA total of 553 residents participated. There was evidence of inter-rater reliability with Kappa scores of .86 to 1.00 and internal consistency based on the Rasch analysis (item reliability of .98). There was some support for validity based on item fit and hypothesis testing as resistiveness to care was significantly associated with total QuIS scores.
conclusionThis study supports the use of the quantified QuIS to evaluate the quality of interactions over time and to test interventions to improve interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.