Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33863800›Full record

SynthesisCMAJ open

Effects of a single-entry intake system on access to outpatient visits to specialist physicians and allied health professionals: a systematic review.

Milica Milakovic, Ann Marie Corrado, Mina Tadrous, Mary E Nguyen, Sandra Vuong, Noah M Ivers

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  6. Single-entry models as an ethical approach to decreasing surgical wait times.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  7. Effect of single-entry referral models and team-based care on wait times for hip and knee joint replacement in Ontario: a simulation study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Primary care in the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: Lessons from Ontario.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The emergency department is no place to be told you have cancer.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Perceptions of Otolaryngologists on Single-Entry Models for Managing Wait Times in Community-Based Health Care in Ontario: A Qualitative Study.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
  17. "My Quality of Life is Not There. I'm Dying Here. I Cannot Take This Anymore." Exploring Patient Experiences With Surgical Wait Times in Otolaryngology: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
  18. Evaluating Perceptions of Head and Neck Surgeons on the Role of Single-Entry Models in Managing Surgical Waitlists in Ontario: A Qualitative Study.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Milica MilakovicFaculty of Medicine (Milakovic), Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Tadrous), Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Ivers), University of Toronto; The Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Corrado) and Women's College Research Institute (Tadrous, Ivers), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Nguyen), Western University, London, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Vuong), University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia milica.milakovic@mail.utoronto.ca.
Ann Marie CorradoFaculty of Medicine (Milakovic), Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Tadrous), Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Ivers), University of Toronto; The Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Corrado) and Women's College Research Institute (Tadrous, Ivers), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Nguyen), Western University, London, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Vuong), University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Mina TadrousFaculty of Medicine (Milakovic), Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Tadrous), Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Ivers), University of Toronto; The Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Corrado) and Women's College Research Institute (Tadrous, Ivers), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Nguyen), Western University, London, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Vuong), University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Mary E NguyenFaculty of Medicine (Milakovic), Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Tadrous), Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Ivers), University of Toronto; The Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Corrado) and Women's College Research Institute (Tadrous, Ivers), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Nguyen), Western University, London, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Vuong), University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Sandra VuongFaculty of Medicine (Milakovic), Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Tadrous), Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Ivers), University of Toronto; The Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Corrado) and Women's College Research Institute (Tadrous, Ivers), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Nguyen), Western University, London, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Vuong), University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Noah M IversFaculty of Medicine (Milakovic), Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Tadrous), Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Ivers), University of Toronto; The Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Corrado) and Women's College Research Institute (Tadrous, Ivers), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Nguyen), Western University, London, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Vuong), University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
University of Toronto · CAUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCanada lags behind other countries with respect to wait times for specialist physician and allied health professional consultations. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effects of a single-entry model on waiting time, referral volume and the satisfaction of patients and health care providers.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and CINAHL databases from inception to December 2019. We included studies from countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development that reported on the effects of a single-entry model on the time between referral to first assessment by a specialist physician or allied health professional, termed wait time 1 (WT1). Patient volume and the satisfaction of providers and patients were secondary outcomes. We conducted a narrative synthesis using descriptive statistics.

resultsOf the 4637 citations identified, 17 met the eligibility criteria, and we included 10 of these in the final analysis. All of the included studies reported an absolute reduction in WT1 after implementation of the single-entry model. The average percent reduction in WT1 across specialties was greatest for surgical referrals (57%) and urgent internal medicine referrals (40%). Higher initial WT1 was associated with a greater absolute reduction in WT1 after implementation of the single-entry model (

interpretationSingle-entry models were associated with an absolute reduction in time from referral from primary care to consultation. These models represent a promising option to improve access to a range of health services, but there is a need for rigorous prospective evaluations to inform policy. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42018100395.

Indexed as

Referral and ConsultationWaiting ListsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansModels, OrganizationalQuality ImprovementTime-to-Treatment

Identifiers

PMID33863800
PMCPMC8084550
OpenAlexW3154983105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.