Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33863715›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Protocol for a mixed-method study to inform the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale multicentre study comparing the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservation as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in women unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (the ANTHEM Feasibility Study).

Charlotte Davies, Christopher Holcombe, Joanna Skillman, Lisa Whisker, William Hollingworth, Carmel Conefrey, Nicola Mills, Paul White, Charles Comins, Douglas Macmillan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte DaviesBristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK Charlotte.Davies@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3468-4258
Christopher HolcombeLinda McCartney Breast Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Joanna SkillmanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Lisa WhiskerNottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
William HollingworthHealth Economics at Bristol, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Carmel ConefreyPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Nicola MillsPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Paul WhiteApplied Statistics Group, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Charles CominsUniversity Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Douglas MacmillanNottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Patricia FairbrotherIndependent Cancer Patients Voice (ICPV), Bristol, UK.
Shelley PotterBristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6977-312X
At Bristol · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBCoventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust · GBSouthmead Hospital · GBThe Patients Association · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of the West of England · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionApproximately 40% of the 55 000 women diagnosed with breast cancer each year in the UK undergo mastectomy because they are considered unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (BCS) due to tumour size or multiple tumour foci. Mastectomy can significantly impact women's quality of life, and only one in four women currently undergo immediate breast reconstruction (IBR).Level 2 oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OPBCS) combines removing the cancer with a range of plastic surgical volume replacement (eg, local perforator flaps) and volume displacement techniques (eg, therapeutic mammaplasty) that can extend the role of BCS and may allow some women not suitable for standard BCS to avoid mastectomy. High-quality research to determine whether OPBCS offers a safe and effective alternative to mastectomy±IBR is currently lacking. Preliminary work is needed to ensure a future large-scale study is feasible and well designed and addresses questions important to patients and the National Health Service. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Mixed methods will be used to inform feasibility and design of a future large-scale study comparing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of OPBCS and mastectomy±IBR. It will have four parts: (1) a National Practice Questionnaire to determine current practice and provision of oncoplastic breast and reconstructive surgery in the UK; (2) a pilot multicentre prospective cohort study to explore the proportion of patients choosing OPBCS versus mastectomy, the proportion in OPBCS is successful and clinical and patient-reported outcomes of different techniques at 3 and 12 months postsurgery; (3) a qualitative interview study to explore patients' attitudes to different procedures, rationale for decision-making and perceptions of outcomes; and (4) design of the future study.All centres offering OPBCS and mastectomy in the UK will be invited to participate. Recruitment is planned to commence winter 2020 and continue for 12 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has ethical approval from the Wales Research Ethics Committee 6 National Research Ethics Service (REC Ref 20/WA/0225). Results will be presented at national and international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. We will work with patients to develop lay summaries and share these through patient groups and breast cancer charities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN18238549.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalMulticenter Studies as TopicPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective StudiesQuality of LifeState MedicineWalesadult surgerybreast surgerybreast tumoursplastic & reconstructive surgeryqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID33863715
PMCPMC8055121
OpenAlexW3152885820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.