Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33863390›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2021

Intra-patient comparison of physiologic

Medhat M Osman, Amir Iravani, Michael S Hofman, Rodney J Hicks

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  3. Intraindividual comparison of [EJNMMI research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Medhat M OsmanDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA. medhat.osman@health.slu.edu.
Amir IravaniMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Michael S HofmanCentre for Molecular Imaging, Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rodney J HicksCentre for Molecular Imaging, Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUMallinckrodt (United States) · USSaint Louis University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies reported metabolic uptake in at least one of the evaluated ganglia in 98.5% of patients undergoing CASE PRESENTATION: This pictorial essay is to illustrate and compare, in the same patient, various representative cases of

conclusionReading physicians should be aware of the frequently encountered and occasionally different physiologic uptake of

Indexed as

Edetic AcidGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesGangliaHumansMaleOligopeptidesPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsEdetic Acidgallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesOligopeptides18F-DCFPyL PET/CT68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CTGangliaPSMA

Identifiers

PMID33863390
PMCPMC8052677
OpenAlexW3152530814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.