ArticleGenome biology2021
A verified genomic reference sample for assessing performance of cancer panels detecting small variants of low allele frequency.
Article in Genome biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid biopsy in modern medicine: advancing diagnostics from molecular insights to clinical practice.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Tumor-naïve ctDNA detection with deep learning-enhanced error suppression for sensitive mutation calling.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Characterization of subclonal variants in HG002 Genome in a Bottle reference material as a resource for benchmarking variant callers.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Comprehensive benchmarking of methods for mutation calling in circulating tumor DNA.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Evaluation of false positive and false negative errors in targeted next generation sequencing.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Multi-omics strategies for biomarker discovery and application in personalized oncology.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
- Implementation of an ISO 15189 accredited next generation sequencing service for cell-free total nucleic acid (cfTNA) analysis to facilitate driver mutation reporting in blood: the experience of a clinical diagnostic laboratory.Journal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
- Development and extensive sequencing of a broadly-consented Genome in a Bottle matched tumor-normal pair.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Development and extensive sequencing of a broadly-consented Genome in a Bottle matched tumor-normal pair.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Augmenting precision medicine via targeted RNA-Seq detection of expressed mutations.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Multi-omics Quality Assessment in Personalized Medicine Through European Infrastructure for Translational Medicine (EATRIS): An Overview.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Evaluative Methodology for HRD Testing: Development of Standard Tools for Consistency Assessment.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Improvement of the sensitivity of circulating tumor DNA-based liquid biopsy: current approaches and future perspectives.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Review
- A robust benchmark for detecting low-frequency variants in the HG002 Genome In A Bottle NIST reference material.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- NCI workshop on ctDNA in cancer treatment and clinical care.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- Reference Materials for Improving Reliability of Multiomics Profiling.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Targeted DNA-seq and RNA-seq of Reference Samples with Short-read and Long-read Sequencing.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Multi-omics data integration using ratio-based quantitative profiling with Quartet reference materials.Nature biotechnology · 2024Article
- Towards accurate indel calling for oncopanel sequencing through an international pipeline competition at precisionFDA.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Extend the benchmarking indel set by manual review using the individual cell line sequencing data from the Sequencing Quality Control 2 (SEQC2) project.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
74 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOncopanel genomic testing, which identifies important somatic variants, is increasingly common in medical practice and especially in clinical trials. Currently, there is a paucity of reliable genomic reference samples having a suitably large number of pre-identified variants for properly assessing oncopanel assay analytical quality and performance. The FDA-led Sequencing and Quality Control Phase 2 (SEQC2) consortium analyze ten diverse cancer cell lines individually and their pool, termed Sample A, to develop a reference sample with suitably large numbers of coding positions with known (variant) positives and negatives for properly evaluating oncopanel analytical performance.
resultsIn reference Sample A, we identify more than 40,000 variants down to 1% allele frequency with more than 25,000 variants having less than 20% allele frequency with 1653 variants in COSMIC-related genes. This is 5-100× more than existing commercially available samples. We also identify an unprecedented number of negative positions in coding regions, allowing statistical rigor in assessing limit-of-detection, sensitivity, and precision. Over 300 loci are randomly selected and independently verified via droplet digital PCR with 100% concordance. Agilent normal reference Sample B can be admixed with Sample A to create new samples with a similar number of known variants at much lower allele frequency than what exists in Sample A natively, including known variants having allele frequency of 0.02%, a range suitable for assessing liquid biopsy panels.
conclusionThese new reference samples and their admixtures provide superior capability for performing oncopanel quality control, analytical accuracy, and validation for small to large oncopanels and liquid biopsy assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.