Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33863358›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2021

Radiomics for prediction of radiation-induced lung injury and oncologic outcome after robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung cancer: results from two independent institutions.

Khaled Bousabarah, Oliver Blanck, Susanne Temming, Maria-Lisa Wilhelm, Mauritius Hoevels, Wolfgang W Baus, Daniel Ruess, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle, Maximilian I Ruge, Harald Treuer and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Feature selection methods and predictive models in CT lung cancer radiomics.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Khaled BousabarahDepartment of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Oliver BlanckDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Susanne TemmingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Maria-Lisa WilhelmSaphir Radiosurgery Center Northern Germany, Guestrow, Germany.
Mauritius HoevelsDepartment of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Wolfgang W BausDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Daniel RuessDepartment of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Veerle Visser-VandewalleDepartment of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Maximilian I RugeDepartment of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Harald TreuerDepartment of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Martin KocherDepartment of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. martin.kocher@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5674-9227
University Hospital Cologne · DESAPHIR Radiochirurgie · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo generate and validate state-of-the-art radiomics models for prediction of radiation-induced lung injury and oncologic outcome in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

methodsRadiomics models were generated from the planning CT images of 110 patients with primary, inoperable stage I/IIa NSCLC who were treated with robotic SBRT using a risk-adapted fractionation scheme at the University Hospital Cologne (training cohort). In total, 199 uncorrelated radiomic features fulfilling the standards of the Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI) were extracted from the outlined gross tumor volume (GTV). Regularized models (Coxnet and Gradient Boost) for the development of local lung fibrosis (LF), local tumor control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were built from either clinical/ dosimetric variables, radiomics features or a combination thereof and validated in a comparable cohort of 71 patients treated by robotic SBRT at the Radiosurgery Center in Northern Germany (test cohort).

resultsOncologic outcome did not differ significantly between the two cohorts (OS at 36 months 56% vs. 43%, p = 0.065; median DFS 25 months vs. 23 months, p = 0.43; LC at 36 months 90% vs. 93%, p = 0.197). Local lung fibrosis developed in 33% vs. 35% of the patients (p = 0.75), all events were observed within 36 months. In the training cohort, radiomics models were able to predict OS, DFS and LC (concordance index 0.77-0.99, p < 0.005), but failed to generalize to the test cohort. In opposite, models for the development of lung fibrosis could be generated from both clinical/dosimetric factors and radiomic features or combinations thereof, which were both predictive in the training set (concordance index 0.71- 0.79, p < 0.005) and in the test set (concordance index 0.59-0.66, p < 0.05). The best performing model included 4 clinical/dosimetric variables (GTV-D

conclusionDespite the obvious difficulties in generalizing predictive models for oncologic outcome and toxicity, this analysis shows that carefully designed radiomics models for prediction of local lung fibrosis after SBRT of early stage lung cancer perform well across different institutions.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDisease-Free SurvivalDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung InjuryLung NeoplasmsMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary FibrosisRadiation InjuriesRadiometry

Identifiers

PMID33863358
PMCPMC8052812
OpenAlexW3156046977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.