Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33863357›Full record

ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2021

Podiatry as a career in the UK - what attracts Generation Z? A qualitative exploration with university and college students.

D Whitham, S Whitham, M Trowell, S Otter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D WhithamSchool of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, 49 Darley Rd, Eastbourne, BN20 7UR, UK.
S WhithamGills Farm, London Rd, Battle, London, UK.
M TrowellWidening Participation Team, University of Brighton, Trevin Towers, Gaudick Road, Eastbourne, BN20 7SP, UK.
S OtterSchool of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, 49 Darley Rd, Eastbourne, BN20 7UR, UK. s.otter@brighton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3569-1118

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraining for a career in podiatry is reported to provide graduates with excellent employability, alongside professional autonomy and suitable renumeration. Yet, there has been an ongoing decline in the number of those applying to study the subject. There is limited literature associated with this topic and we sought to explore the factors that attract 'generation Z' (those born 1995-2010) to a potential career in podiatry.

methodA qualitative design framework underpinned by phenomenological principles used four focus groups over a two-year period to generate data from participants at University and in Further Education. Focus group conversations were led by external facilitator, recorded, independently transcribed verbatim and anonymised prior to thematic analysis. This was followed by external, independent verification of themes.

resultsFour main themes were determined from the analysis i) a lack of awareness of podiatry; ii) podiatry: accessible course, accessible career; iii) career status; iv) breadth/opportunity of the scope of practice. Both positive and negative experiences were reported and highlighted key gaps in how the attractiveness of a career in podiatry is portrayed.

conclusionThe chronic lack of awareness of podiatry as a career clearly needs to be addressed, ideally with more positive role modelling in mainstream and popular media. The career status offered together with the breadth of, and opportunity associated with, the scope of practice should continue to be celebrated.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceAdolescentFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePodiatryQualitative ResearchStudentsUnited KingdomUniversitiesYoung AdultCareerGeneration ZPodiatry

Identifiers

PMID33863357
PMCPMC8052815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.