Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33863334›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2021

Engineered sex ratio distortion by X-shredding in the global agricultural pest Ceratitis capitata.

Angela Meccariello, Flavia Krsticevic, Rita Colonna, Giuseppe Del Corsano, Barbara Fasulo, Philippos Aris Papathanos, Nikolai Windbichler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. New Insights into theJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2023
    Review
  17. Bypassing Mendel's First Law: Transmission Ratio Distortion in Mammals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Angela MeccarielloDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, London, UK.
Flavia KrsticevicDepartment of Entomology, Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.
Rita ColonnaDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, London, UK.
Giuseppe Del CorsanoDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, London, UK.
Barbara FasuloDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, London, UK.
Philippos Aris PapathanosDepartment of Entomology, Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel. p.papathanos@mail.huji.ac.il.
Nikolai WindbichlerDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, London, UK. nikolai.windbichler@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GBHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P000843/1Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca 79 04.02.2014United States - Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund IS-5180-19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic sex ratio distorters are systems aimed at effecting a bias in the reproductive sex ratio of a population and could be applied for the area-wide control of sexually reproducing insects that vector disease or disrupt agricultural production. One example of such a system leading to male bias is X-shredding, an approach that interferes with the transmission of the X-chromosome by inducing multiple DNA double-strand breaks during male meiosis. Endonucleases targeting the X-chromosome and whose activity is restricted to male gametogenesis have recently been pioneered as a means to engineer such traits.

resultsHere, we enabled endogenous CRISPR/Cas9 and CRISPR/Cas12a activity during spermatogenesis of the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata, a worldwide agricultural pest of extensive economic significance. In the absence of a chromosome-level assembly, we analysed long- and short-read genome sequencing data from males and females to identify two clusters of abundant and X-chromosome-specific sequence repeats. When targeted by gRNAs in conjunction with Cas9, cleavage of these repeats yielded a significant and consistent distortion of the sex ratio towards males in independent transgenic strains, while the combination of distinct distorters induced a strong bias (~ 80%).

conclusionWe provide a first demonstration of CRISPR-based sex distortion towards male bias in a non-model organism, the global pest insect Ceratitis capitata. Although the sex ratio bias reached in our study would require improvement, possibly through the generation and combination of additional transgenic lines, to result in a system with realistic applicability in the field, our results suggest that strains with characteristics suitable for field application can now be developed for a range of medically or agriculturally relevant insect species.

Indexed as

Ceratitis capitataAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCRISPR-Cas SystemsFemaleMaleRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsSex RatioX ChromosomeRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

PMID33863334
PMCPMC8051031
OpenAlexW3156173104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.