Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33863326›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2021

An Integrated eDiagnosis Approach (IeDA) versus standard IMCI for assessing and managing childhood illness in Burkina Faso: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.

Sophie Sarrassat, James J Lewis, Arsene S Some, Serge Somda, Simon Cousens, Karl Blanchet

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02341469 (Integrated eDiagnosis Assessment), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02341469 nacompletednot on this map

Integrated eDiagnosis Assessment (IeDA) for Children Under Five Years Old: a Stepped-wedge Randomized Cluster Trial of a Quality Improvement of the Management of Children Illnesses in Burkina Faso at the Primary Health Care Level

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2014 to 2017Enrolled7,200ConditionsIMCI Guidelines, Childhood IllnessesArmsintegrated ediagnostic approach (IeDA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sophie SarrassatCentre for Maternal Adolescent Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. sophie.sarrassat@lshtm.ac.uk.
James J LewisY Lab, the Public Services Innovation Lab for Wales, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Arsene S SomeCentre Muraz, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Serge SomdaCentre Muraz, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Simon CousensCentre for Maternal Adolescent Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Karl BlanchetCentre for Maternal Adolescent Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1084359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Integrated eDiagnosis Approach (IeDA), centred on an electronic Clinical Decision Support System (eCDSS) developed in line with national Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) guidelines, was implemented in primary health facilities of two regions of Burkina Faso. An evaluation was performed using a stepped-wedge cluster randomised design with the aim of determining whether the IeDA intervention increased Health Care Workers' (HCW) adherence to the IMCI guidelines.

methodsTen randomly selected facilities per district were visited at each step by two trained nurses: One observed under-five consultations and the second conducted a repeat consultation. The primary outcomes were: overall adherence to clinical assessment tasks; overall correct classification ignoring the severity of the classifications; and overall correct prescription according to HCWs' classifications. Statistical comparisons between trial arms were performed on cluster/step-level summaries.

resultsOn average, 54 and 79% of clinical assessment tasks were observed to be completed by HCWs in the control and intervention districts respectively (cluster-level mean difference = 29.9%; P-value = 0.002). The proportion of children for whom the validation nurses and the HCWs recorded the same classifications (ignoring the severity) was 73 and 79% in the control and intervention districts respectively (cluster-level mean difference = 10.1%; P-value = 0.004). The proportion of children who received correct prescriptions in accordance with HCWs' classifications were similar across arms, 78% in the control arm and 77% in the intervention arm (cluster-level mean difference = - 1.1%; P-value = 0.788).

conclusionThe IeDA intervention improved substantially HCWs' adherence to IMCI's clinical assessment tasks, leading to some overall increase in correct classifications but to no overall improvement in correct prescriptions. The largest improvements tended to be observed for less common conditions. For more common conditions, HCWs in the control districts performed relatively well, thus limiting the scope to detect an overall impact.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02341469 ; First submitted August 272,014, posted January 19, 2015.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedBurkina FasoChildHealth PersonnelHumansReferral and ConsultationBurkina FasoElectronic clinical decision support systemHealth care workers’ adherenceIntegrated Management of Childhood Illness

Identifiers

PMID33863326
PMCPMC8052659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.