Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33863319›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

Conceptual evolution of 3D printing in orthopedic surgery and traumatology: from "do it yourself" to "point of care manufacturing".

Jose Antonio Calvo-Haro, Javier Pascau, Lydia Mediavilla-Santos, Pablo Sanz-Ruiz, Coral Sánchez-Pérez, Javier Vaquero-Martín, Rubén Perez-Mañanes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Application of 3-dimensional printing implants for bone tumors.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2022
    Article
  18. 3D printing applications in spine surgery: an evidence-based assessment toward personalized patient care.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jose Antonio Calvo-HaroOrthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, Postal code, 28007, Madrid, Spain. calvoharo.md.phd@gmail.com.
Javier PascauInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Lydia Mediavilla-SantosOrthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, Postal code, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Pablo Sanz-RuizOrthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, Postal code, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Coral Sánchez-PérezOrthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, Postal code, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Javier Vaquero-MartínOrthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, Postal code, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Rubén Perez-MañanesOrthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, Postal code, 28007, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades Project PI18/01625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background3D printing technology in hospitals facilitates production models such as point-of-care manufacturing. Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology is the specialty that can most benefit from the advantages of these tools. The purpose of this study is to present the results of the integration of 3D printing technology in a Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology and to identify the productive model of the point-of-care manufacturing as a paradigm of personalized medicine.

methodsObservational, descriptive, retrospective and monocentric study of a total of 623 additive manufacturing processes carried out in a Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology from November 2015 to March 2020. Variables such as product type, utility, time or materials for manufacture were analyzed.

resultsThe areas of expertise that have performed more processes are Traumatology, Reconstructive and Orthopedic Oncology. Pre-operative planning is their primary use. Working and 3D printing hours, as well as the amount of 3D printing material used, vary according to the type of product or material delivered to perform the process. The most commonly used 3D printing material for manufacturing is polylactic acid, although biocompatible resin has been used to produce surgical guides. In addition, the hospital has worked on the co-design of customized implants with manufacturing companies.

conclusionsThe integration of 3D printing in a Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology allows identifying the conceptual evolution from "Do-It-Yourself" to "POC manufacturing".

Indexed as

Orthopedic ProceduresTraumatologyHumansModels, AnatomicPoint-of-Care SystemsPrinting, Three-DimensionalRetrospective Studies3D printingBiomodelsCustom implantsManufacturing university hospitalPOC manufacturingPreoperative planningSurgical guides

Identifiers

PMID33863319
PMCPMC8051827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.