Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33863278›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Can volunteer medical visit companions support older adults in the United States?

Orla C Sheehan, Marcela D Blinka, David L Roth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Scoping Review of the Factor Associated with Older Adults' Mobility Barriers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Orla C SheehanCenter on Aging and Health, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 2024 E. Monument Street, Suite 2-700, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. osheeha1@jhmi.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5078-9519
Marcela D BlinkaCenter on Aging and Health, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 2024 E. Monument Street, Suite 2-700, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
David L RothCenter on Aging and Health, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 2024 E. Monument Street, Suite 2-700, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Strengthening Informal Support Resources with Strategic Methodological AdvancesP30AG048773 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ROTH, DAVID L · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG048773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults are encouraged to use Medical Visit Companions (MVCs) for routine medical encounters; however, many vulnerable older adults attend alone or fail to attend. In the absence of available family or friends, community volunteers could potentially fill this gap. We aimed to understand the role and acceptability of volunteer MVCs accompanying older adults to medical visits and explore potential barriers and facilitators of increasing MVC availability and expanding roles beyond transportation.

methodsTwo moderators conducted 4 focus groups with 29 volunteers grouped by whether they provided (n = 15) or received (n = 14) rides to medical visits. All were members of Partners In Care (PIC), a community organization in Maryland, United States which offers a range of programs and services that support the independence of older adults including the provision of volunteer MVCs. Participants were asked to discuss why they were involved with PIC, and to describe their experiences with providing or receiving companionship during medical visits. Inductive thematic analysis was used to explore the views and experiences of participants, particularly around the roles played by MVCs and the feasibility of expanding these roles.

resultsAll participants reported benefits from their role whether that was giving or receiving rides. Many accompanied participants reported missing medical appointments prior to joining PIC and being able to avail of the services of a MVC. Volunteer roles varied and ranged from transportation only, help with care coordination and in some cases accompanying the person into their medical visit. A subgroup of volunteers expressed a willingness to take on additional roles during the physician visit following additional training and isolated older adults welcomed the prospect of their assistance.

conclusionOur qualitative data indicate that non-family, volunteer MVCs are willing and able to assist older people going to a medical visit. With appropriate training and support, volunteer companions could do much to improve the healthcare experience for those who otherwise would attend alone or would not attend medical visits.

Indexed as

FriendsVolunteersAgedAged, 80 and overFocus GroupsHumansMarylandUnited StatesIsolated older adultsMedical visit companionVolunteer

Identifiers

PMID33863278
PMCPMC8052762
OpenAlexW3154200146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.