Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33863236›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2021

US Food and Drug Administration utilization of postmarketing requirements and postmarketing commitments, 2009-2018.

Joshua J Skydel, Audrey D Zhang, Sanket S Dhruva, Joseph S Ross, Joshua D Wallach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Physician-Patient Communication about Novel Drugs and High-Risk Medical Devices.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua J SkydelTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3527-4277
Audrey D ZhangDuke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9753-4276
Sanket S DhruvaSection of Cardiology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Joseph S RossSection of General Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9218-3320
Joshua D WallachDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2816-6905

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale-Mayo FDA Center for Excellence in Regulatory Science and InnovationU01FD005938 · FDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Joseph Solomon Ross · 2016 to 2026
$25.4M
UCSF Career Development Program in Implementation Research in Heart and Lung DiseasesK12HL138046 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BIBBINS-DOMINGO, KIRSTEN, CATTAMANCHI, ADITHYA · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
Understanding hospital value: provider, hospital and community effectsR01HS022882 · AHRQ · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HORWITZ, LEORA · 2014 to 2023
$2.9M
Identifying Patient Subgroups That Are Most Likely To Benefit From Medications Used To Treat Alcohol Use DisorderK01AA028258 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WALLACH, JOSHUA DAVID · 2021 to 2025
$892k
Optimizing Medical Device Post-Market Surveillance for Public ValueU01FD004585 · FDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KRUMHOLZ, HARLAN MARC · 2012 to 2016
$592k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS022882FDA HHS U01 FD004585FDA HHS U01 FD005938NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL138046NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA028258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsThe US Food and Drug Administration outlines clinical studies as postmarketing requirements and commitments to be fulfilled following approval of new drugs and biologics ("therapeutics"). Regulators have increasingly emphasized lifecycle evaluation of approved therapeutics, and postmarketing studies are intended to advance our understanding of therapeutic safety and efficacy. However, little is known about the indications that clinical studies outlined in postmarketing requirements and commitments investigate, including whether they are intended to generate evidence for approved or other clinical indications. Therefore, we characterized US Food and Drug Administration postmarketing requirements and commitments for new therapeutics approved from 2009 to 2018.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of all novel therapeutics, including small-molecule drugs and biologics, receiving original US Food and Drug Administration approval from 2009 to 2018, using approval letters accessed through the Drug@FDA database. Outcomes included the number and characteristics of US Food and Drug Administration postmarketing requirements and commitments for new therapeutics at original approval, including the types of studies outlined, the indications to be investigated, and the clinical evidence to be generated.

resultsFrom 2009 to 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration approved 343 new therapeutics with 1978 postmarketing requirements and commitments. Overall, 750 (37.9%) postmarketing requirements and commitments outlined clinical studies. For 71 of 343 (20.7%) therapeutics, no postmarketing requirements or commitments for clinical studies were outlined, while at least 1 was outlined for 272 (79.3%; median 2 (interquartile range: 1-4)). Among these 272 therapeutics, the number of postmarketing requirements and commitments for clinical studies per therapeutic did not change from 2009 (median: 2 (interquartile range: 1-4)) to 2018 (median: 2 (interquartile range: 1-3)). Among the 750 postmarketing requirements and commitments for clinical studies, 448 (59.7%) outlined new prospective cohort studies, registries, or clinical trials, while the remainder outlined retrospective studies, secondary analyses, or completion of ongoing studies. Although 455 (60.7%) clinical studies investigated only original approved therapeutic indications, 123 (16.4%) enrolled from an expansion of the approved disease population and 61 (8.1%) investigated diseases unrelated to approved indications.

conclusionsThe US Food and Drug Administration approves most new therapeutics with at least 1 postmarketing requirement or commitment for a clinical study, and outlines investigations of safety or efficacy for both approved and unapproved indications. The median number of 2 clinical studies outlined has remained relatively constant over the last decade. Given increasing emphasis by the US Food and Drug Administration on faster approval and lifecycle evaluation of therapeutics, these findings suggest that more postmarketing requirements and commitments may be necessary to address gaps in the clinical evidence available for therapeutics at approval.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingCross-Sectional StudiesHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administrationclinical evidenceclinical trialspharmaceutical regulationpostmarketing commitmentspostmarketing requirementsThe US Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID33863236
PMCPMC8292154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.