Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33862998›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2001

The cytoskeleton in plant cell growth: lessons from root hairs.

Tijs Ketelaar, Anne Mie C Emons

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Phosphorylation of RhoGDI1, a Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor, regulates root hair development inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tijs KetelaarLaboratory of Plant Cell Biology, Wageningen University, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD Wageningen, The Netherlands; Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Durham, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.
Anne Mie C Emons
Durham University · GBGraduate School Experimental Plant Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we compare expansion of intercalary growing cells, in which growth takes place over a large surface, and root hairs, where expansion occurs at the tip only. Research that pinpoints the role of the cytoskeleton and the cytoplasmic free calcium in both root hairs and intercalary growing cells is reviewed. From the results of that research, we suggest experiments to be carried out on intercalary growing cells to test our hypotheses on plant cell expansion. Our main hypothesis is that instability of the cortical actin cytoskeleton determines the location where expansion takes place and the amount of expansion. Contents Summary 409 I. How do plant cells expand their surface? 409 II. Immunolocalization of epitopes in fixed root hairs for light-microscopy 410 III. The cytoskeleton in growing root hairs 412 1. Microtubules 412 2. Actin filaments 413 3. Free cytoplasmic calcium concentration 413 IV. The role of cytoskeletal elements and cytoplasmic free alcium in intercalary expanding root cells 414 1. Microtubules 414 2. Actin filaments 415 3. Free cytoplasmic calcium concentration 416 Acknowledgements 416 References 416.

Indexed as

actincalciumcell expansioncytoskeletonexocytosismicrotubuleroot hair

Identifiers

PMID33862998
OpenAlexW2111368522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.