Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33862994›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2001

Plant hormones and the control of physiological processes.

Jonathan D B Weyers, Neil W Paterson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 206 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Growth, phytohormone and transcriptome responses ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. HFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  15. A Travel through Landscapes of Seed Dormancy.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan D B WeyersSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, UK.
Neil W PatersonSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, UK.
University of Dundee · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review examines contemporary views of the role of plant hormones in the control of physiological processes. Past and present difficulties with nomenclature encapsulate the problems inherent in using the 'classic' hormone concept in plants, with their distinctive multicellular organization. Chemical control may be a more relevant notion. However, control may also reside in the responding tissue via changes in sensitivity, or as combined control, where response is dictated by both sensitivity and concentration. Criteria for demonstrating these modes of action are reviewed, as well as frameworks for deciding whether hormone transport is involved. Problems of measuring relevant hormone concentrations are discussed. Methods for measuring and comparing tissue sensitivity to hormones are outlined and relative control is introduced as a means of assessing the importance of hormonal control against a background of other influences. While animals and plants appear to have coinherited homologueous intracellular signalling systems, at the whole organism level modes of hormone action may diverge. It is postulated that the synthesis-transport-action mechanism of action may be just one of several possible ways that phytohormones could control physiological processes. Twelve separate roles are discussed, and it is suggested that some of these could operate simultaneously to the plant's advantage. Contents Summary 375 I. Introduction 376 II. The history of the hormone concept in plant systems 376 III. Issues of nomenclature 380 IV. The need for sound conceptual frameworks in plant hormone research 382 V. Development of criteria for chemical control 384 VI. Identification and quantitative analysis of plant hormones 387 VII. Hormone transport in plants 389 VIII. Hormone sensitivity and its quantification 390 IX. Roles of receptors, second messengers and signal amplification in hormone sensitivity changes 393 X. Relative control as a pivotal concept 395 XI. Diversity of physiological roles for chemical influences in plants 397 XII. Concluding remarks 400 Acknowledgements 402 References 402.

Indexed as

dose-response curvephytohormoneplant hormonerelative controlsecond messengersensitivity

Identifiers

PMID33862994
OpenAlexW2148867085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.