Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33862490›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2021

Preclinical data and safety assessment of phage therapy in humans.

Janet Y Nale, Martha Rj Clokie

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Bacteriophage therapy- a refurbished age-old potential strategy to treat antibiotic and multidrug resistant bacterial infections in future.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Molecular Aspects of the Functioning of Pathogenic Bacteria Biofilm Based onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Designing molecules: directing stem cell differentiation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Bacteriophage Therapy to Control Bovine Mastitis: A Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Janet Y NaleDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, LE1 7RH, UK.
Martha Rj ClokieDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, LE1 7RH, UK. Electronic address: mrjc1@le.ac.uk.
University of Leicester · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council RM38G0140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriophages (phages) are natural biological entities that kill bacteria with species specific precision, rendering them attractive for therapeutic purposes. Phages were discovered over a century ago, but, after antibiotic discovery, their use as antimicrobials dwindled. Interest in phage therapy has, however, been rekindled by increasing multi-drug resistance to routine and frontline antibiotics and by the slowing of antibiotic innovations. To build on fundamental phage research studies and compassionate usage, information on safety and efficacy of phages is needed to motivate clinical trials and are necessary for phage therapy to become mainstream. In this review, we discussed essential phage characterisation parameters alongside the merits and limitations of state-of-the-art models to gather preclinical data on the safety and efficacy of phage therapeutics.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsBacteriophagesPhage TherapyAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaHumansAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID33862490
PMCPMC8150739
OpenAlexW3153392403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.