Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33862241›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2021

'Visual' cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go task.

Shipra Kanjlia, Rita E Loiotile, Nora Harhen, Marina Bedny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Excitatory and inhibitory networks diverge following early blindness.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shipra KanjliaDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, United States; Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, 346 Baker Hall, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States. Electronic address: skanjlia@andrew.cmu.edu.
Rita E LoiotileDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, United States; Facebook, United States.
Nora HarhenDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, United States; Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California Irvine, United States.
Marina BednyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, United States.

Funding

Visual cortex plasticity in blindness: a window into flexibility of human cortexR01EY027352 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BEDNY, MARINA · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of occipital cortex plasticity in blindness provide insight into how intrinsic constraints interact with experience to determine cortical specialization. We tested the cognitive nature and anatomical origins of occipital responses during non-verbal, non-spatial auditory tasks. In a go/no-go task, congenitally blind (N=23) and sighted (N=24) individuals heard rapidly occurring (<1/s) non-verbal sounds and made one of two button presses (frequent-go 50%, infrequent-go 25%) or withheld a response (no-go, 25%). Rapid and frequent button presses heighten response selection/inhibition demands on the no-go trials: In sighted and blind adults a right-lateralized prefrontal (PFC) network responded most to no-go trials, followed by infrequent-go and finally frequent-go trials. In the blind group only, a right-lateralized occipital network showed the same response profile and the laterality of occipital and PFC responses was correlated across blind individuals. A second experiment with spoken sentences and equations (N=16) found that no-go responses in occipital cortex are distinct from previously identified occipital responses to spoken language. Finally, in resting-state data (N=30 blind, N=31 blindfolded sighted), no-go responsive 'visual' cortex of blind relative to sighted participants was more synchronized with PFC and less synchronized with primary auditory and sensory-motor cortices. No-go responsive occipital cortex showed higher resting-state correlations with no-go responsive PFC than language responsive inferior frontal cortex. We conclude that in blindness, a right-lateralized occipital network responds to non-verbal executive processes, including response selection. These results suggest that connectivity with fronto-parietal executive networks is a key mechanism for plasticity in blindness.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdultAuditory PerceptionBlindnessBrain MappingExecutive FunctionFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityOccipital LobePrefrontal CortexBlindnessExecutive demandExecutive functionPlasticityPluripotencyResponse selection

Identifiers

PMID33862241
PMCPMC8249356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.