Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33862035›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2021

Fewer patients receive recommendations for pharmacotherapy in primary prevention using the 2018 atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk estimator.

Alessandra M Campos-Staffico, David Cordwin, Yuting Ding, Corey A Lester, Robert D Brook, Jasmine A Luzum, Michael P Dorsch

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alessandra M Campos-StafficoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
David CordwinDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Yuting DingDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Corey A LesterDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Robert D BrookDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Jasmine A LuzumDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Michael P DorschDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: mdorsch@med.umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Precision Medicine for Heart Failure: The Role of Genomics in the Efficacy and Racial Disparity of Cornerstone PharmacotherapyK08HL146990 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LUZUM, JASMINE A · 2019 to 2023
$772k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL146990NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL110279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shortly after the introduction of the 2013 original Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE), an overestimation of risk was suggested. As such, the updated 2018 PCE was developed to more accurately assess atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in the population. Hence, this study aims to compare drug prescribing recommendations in a large, real-world patient population, depending on which PCE is used to estimate 10-year ASCVD risk. This retrospective cohort study identified 20,843 patients aged between 40 and 75 years with no previous ASCVD. The 10-year ASCVD risk score was assessed by using both PCE. Patients were assigned to the four risk categories according to the 2018 ACC/AHA guideline. The percentage of patients qualifying for guideline-recommended primary prevention with statins and/or anti-hypertensives were compared between both PCE. Risk reclassification occurred in 26.7% of patients overall (n = 5571), of which 98.1% (n = 5466) were assigned to lower risk categories with the updated PCE. Non-diabetic (14.0%) patients no longer met the threshold for recommending statins as primary prevention with the updated PCE. Likewise, 13.8% of patients with stage I hypertension no longer met the threshold for recommending antihypertensive drugs with the updated PCE. In conclusion, risk reclassification occurred among 26.7% of patients overall, mostly due to lower risk categories assigned by the updated PCE. Up to 14.0% of patients no longer met the threshold for recommending statin therapy and/or antihypertensive drugs by using the updated PCE. These findings suggest that using the updated PCE could translate into fewer patients receiving pharmacotherapy for ASCVD primary prevention.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsAdultAgedHumansMiddle AgedPrimary PreventionRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsAtherosclerotic diseasePrimary preventionRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID33862035
PMCPMC8573994
OpenAlexW3154004874

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.