Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33861807›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Institutional injustice: Implications for system transformation emerging from the mental health recovery narratives of people experiencing marginalisation.

Ada Hui, Stefan Rennick-Egglestone, Donna Franklin, Rianna Walcott, Joy Llewellyn-Beardsley, Fiona Ng, James Roe, Caroline Yeo, Emilia Deakin, Sarah Brydges and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How to Tell a Recovery Story 'Professionally'? Issues Related to the Transformation of Personal Stories During a Training for Becoming a Peer Support Worker.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. One or Many Recoveries? Recoveries in the Plural for a Better Understanding of One's Healing Journey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Taking Action on Racism and Structural Violence in Psychiatric Training and Clinical Practice.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Psychiatry and/or recovery: a critical analysis.International journal of mental health nursing · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Management of a High-Performing Mental Health Recovery Research Group.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ada HuiSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7416-046X
Stefan Rennick-EgglestoneSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Donna FranklinNEON Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Rianna WalcottDepartment of Digital Humanities, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Joy Llewellyn-BeardsleySchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Fiona NgSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
James RoeNational Institute for Health Research, ARC East Midlands, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Caroline YeoSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Emilia DeakinSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Sarah BrydgesSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Patricia Penas MoranDepartment of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, University of Deusto, Bilbo, Spain.
Rose McGranahanUnit of Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Kristian PollockSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Graham ThornicroftCentre for Global Mental Health and Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mike SladeSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

COBALT: Comorbid Affective Disorders, AIDS/HIV, and Long Term HealthR01MH100470 · NIMH · KING'S COLLEGE LONDON · PI FAIRALL, LARA ROSEMARY, PETERSEN, INGE · 2013 to 2018
$2.0M
Department of Health RP-PG-0615-20016Medical Research Council MR/R023697/1Medical Research Council MR/S001255/1NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInstitutional injustice refers to structures that create disparities in resources, opportunities and representation. Marginalised people experience institutional injustice, inequalities and discrimination through intersecting personal characteristics and social circumstances. This study aimed to investigate sources of institutional injustice and their effects on marginalised people with experience of mental health problems.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 77 individuals from marginalised groups with experience of mental health problems, including psychosis, Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) populations, complex needs and lived experience as a work requirement. These were analysed inductively enabling sensitising concepts to emerge.

findingsThree processes of institutional injustice were identified: not being believed because of social status and personal backgrounds; not being heard where narratives did not align with dominant discourses, and not being acknowledged where aspects of identity were disregarded. Harmful outcomes included disengagement from formal institutions through fear and mistrust, tensions and reduced affiliation with informal institutions when trying to consolidate new ways of being, and damaging impacts on mental health and wellbeing through multiple oppression.

conclusionsInstitutional injustice perpetuates health inequalities and marginalised status. Master status, arising from dominant discourses and heuristic bias, overshadow the narratives and experiences of marginalised people. Cultural competency has the potential to improve heuristic availability through social understandings of narrative and experience, whilst coproduction and narrative development through approaches such as communities of practice might offer meaningful avenues for authentic expression.

Indexed as

Hospitals, PsychiatricSocial MarginalizationAdolescentAdultEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMental Health RecoveryMiddle AgedMinority GroupsQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33861807
PMCPMC8051813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.