ArticlePloS one2021
Physicians' attitude towards webinars and online education amid COVID-19 pandemic: When less is more.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Medical students’ satisfaction level with e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic and its related factors: a systematic reviewJournal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2022Pooled it
- The Impact of Interventional Radiology Educational Webinars during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic and Beyond-The Asia Pacific Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology (APSCVIR) Experience.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2026Article
- Article
- 'Tuning into Learning': A scoping review of podcasts and webinars in orthopaedic education".Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- "I Had No Idea This Happened": Electronic Feedback on Clinical Reasoning for Hospitalists.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Physician preferences for Online and In-person continuing medical education: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Exploring educational transformations through the Innovative Flipped Learning Instruction Project Symposium.Advances in physiology education · 2024Article
- Telemedicine-medical "snack community"-PHS ecosystem: Insights into the double-edged sword role of telemedicine in clinical practice and medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
- COVID-19 pandemic & neurosciences in India- the CoINstudy: Impact of the pandemic on research related to the neurosciences.The Indian journal of medical research · 2024Article
- The evolutionary journey to a new normal for learning and capacity building of healthcare workers to prepare and respond to health emergencies across Africa.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- The impact of COVID-19 on medical students.GMS journal for medical education · 2024Review
- Education and Training Adaptations for Health Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review of Lessons Learned and Innovations.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Preliminary Evaluation of a Web-Based International Journal Club for Ketamine in Psychiatric Disorders: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIR medical education · 2023Article
- Evaluation of a Webinar to Increase Health Professionals' Knowledge about Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of two Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in genomic variant interpretation for the NHS workforce.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- [Webinars for ENT specialists in Germany during the Lockdown phase of the COVID-19 pandemic 2020/2021].Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2023Article
- On the advantages and disadvantages of virtual continuing medical education: a scoping review.Canadian medical education journal · 2023Article
- Physicians' continuing medical education activities and satisfaction with their ability to stay current in medical information and practice: A cross-sectional study.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Educational Psychology Aspects of Learning with Chatbots without Artificial Intelligence: Suggestions for Designers.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023Article
- Exploring indirect impacts of COVID-19 on local health systems from the perspectives of health workers and higher education stakeholders in the Philippines using a phenomenological approach.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince the declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic, all scientific medical activities were shifted to an online format, in the form of webinars, to maintain continuing medical education (CME). We aimed to assess physicians' attitude among different medical specialties towards this sudden and unexpected shift of traditional face-to-face meetings into webinars, and to suggest future recommendations.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional, internet-based survey study using a 25-item questionnaire, from November 1 and November 15, 2020. The survey was created and distributed to physicians from different medical and surgical specialties and from different countries via several social media platforms, using a snowball technique.
resultsA total of 326 physicians responded; 165 (50.6%) were females, mean age of responders was 38.7 ± 7.5 years. The majority of responses (93.2%) came from Arab countries. Of them, 195 (59.8%) reported attending more webinars compared to the same period last year, with average of 3 per month. As regard to the general impression; 244 (74.8%) were "strongly satisfied" or "satisfied", with the most satisfaction for "training courses: by 268 (82.2%), and "International conferences" by 218 (66.9%). However, 246 respondents (75.5%) felt overwhelmed with the number and frequency of webinars during the pandemic, 171 (52.5%) reported attending less than 25% of webinars they are invited to, 205 (62.8%) disagreed that webinars can replace in-person meetings after the pandemic, and 239 (73.3%) agreed that online meetings need proper regulations.
conclusionsWebinars comprised a major avenue for education during COVID-19 pandemic, with initial general satisfaction among physicians. However, this paradigm shift was sudden and lacked proper regulations. Despite initial satisfaction, the majority of physicians felt overwhelmed with the number and frequency of webinars. Physicians' satisfaction is crucial in planning future educational activities, and considering that this current crisis will most likely have long lasting effects, webinars should be viewed as complementing traditional in-person methods, rather than replacement. In this study, we are suggesting recommendations to help future regulation of this change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.