Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33861798›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Results from a malaria indicator survey highlight the importance of routine data capture in high-risk forest and farm transmission sites in Vietnam to tailor location-specific malaria elimination interventions.

Thang Duc Ngo, Sara E Canavati, Dang Viet Dung, Thuan Huu Vo, Duong Thanh Tran, Long Khanh Tran, Rosalie J Whedbee, Ekaterina I Milgotina, Gerard C Kelly, Kimberly A Edgel and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Thang Duc NgoDepartment of Epidemiology, National Institute of Malariology, Parasitology and Entomology, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Sara E CanavatiVysnova Partners, Inc., Landover, Maryland, United States of America.
Dang Viet DungDepartment of Epidemiology, National Institute of Malariology, Parasitology and Entomology, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Thuan Huu VoVysnova Partners, Inc., Landover, Maryland, United States of America.
Duong Thanh TranDepartment of Epidemiology, National Institute of Malariology, Parasitology and Entomology, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Long Khanh TranVysnova Partners, Inc., Landover, Maryland, United States of America.
Rosalie J WhedbeeGlobal Scientific Solutions for Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Ekaterina I MilgotinaGlobal Scientific Solutions for Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Gerard C KellyVysnova Partners, Inc., Landover, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2922-3622
Kimberly A EdgelUnited States Naval Medical Research Unit TWO, Singapore.
Nicholas J MartinUnited States Naval Medical Research Unit TWO, Singapore.
National Institute of Malariology, Parasitology and Entomology · VNScientific Solutions (United States) · USBurnet Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In-line with the World Health Organization's (WHO) Global Technical Strategy for Malaria (2016-2030), Vietnam is striving to eliminate malaria by 2030. Targeting appropriate interventions in high-risk populations such as forest and forest-fringe communities is a critical component of malaria elimination efforts in Vietnam. In 2016, a household-level malaria indicator survey was conducted in Phu Yen Province, Vietnam with the aim of assessing the knowledge, behaviors and associated risks of malaria infection among priority mobile and migrant populations (MMPs) working and sleeping in forests and on farms. A total of 4211 people were included in the survey, comprised of 1074 heads of households and 3137 associated household members. Of the 1074 head-of-household respondents, 472 slept in a forest, 92 slept on a farm, 132 slept in both forests and farms, and 378 slept at their villages within the last 12 months. Age, literacy, and occupation were significantly different among those who slept in a forest versus on a farm. Of 301 respondents who answered questions about malaria risk factors at sleeping sites, 35% were somewhat aware of malaria prevention practices, but only 4% could recall at least four malaria prevention messages. Among the same group of 301 respondents, only 29% used nets and only 11% used treated nets. Ownership and use of nets among forest-goers was significantly lower than those who slept on a farm or in their village. Huts without walls were significantly prominent forest sleeping site locations (POR = 10.3; 95% CI 4.67-22.7). All respondents who slept in a forest requested standby malaria drugs and one-third of them self-treated without blood testing. Results from this study highlight the importance of capturing relevant location-specific data among priority populations such as remote forest and farm going mobile and migrant populations in Vietnam. Data regarding behavioral practices, knowledge, preventative measures, and intervention coverage at remote-area transmission sites must be routinely captured to effectively monitor progress and refine targeted intervention strategies accordingly.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmental BiomarkersFamily CharacteristicsFarmsFemaleForestsHumansMalariaMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesTransients and MigrantsVietnamEnvironmental Biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID33861798
PMCPMC8051764
OpenAlexW3154811522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.