Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33861743›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Assessment of microbiological correlates and immunostimulatory potential of electron beam inactivated metabolically active yet non culturable (MAyNC) Salmonella Typhimurium.

Chandni Praveen, Sohini S Bhatia, Robert C Alaniz, Robert E Droleskey, Noah D Cohen, Palmy R Jesudhasan, Suresh D Pillai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A Mini-Review on Multi-Hurdle Control ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Irradiated oocysts in combination with inulin adjuvant-induced potent immune responses againstVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Controlling the Colonization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chandni PraveenNational Center for Electron Beam Research-an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Collaborating Centre for Electron Beam Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Sohini S BhatiaNational Center for Electron Beam Research-an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Collaborating Centre for Electron Beam Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Robert C AlanizDepartment of Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Robert E DroleskeyFood and Feed Safety Research Unit, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, USDA-ARS, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Noah D CohenDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0384-2903
Palmy R JesudhasanPoultry Production and Product Safety, USDA-ARS, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States of America.
Suresh D PillaiNational Center for Electron Beam Research-an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Collaborating Centre for Electron Beam Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center · USTexas A&M Health Science Center · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the microbiological and immunological basis underlying the efficacy of electron beam-inactivated immune modulators. The underlying hypothesis is that exposure to eBeam-based ionization reactions inactivate microorganisms without modifying their antigenic properties and thereby creating immune modulators. The immunological correlates of protection induced by such eBeam based Salmonella Typhimurium (EBST) immune modulators in dendritic cell (DC) (in vitro) and mice (in vivo) models were assessed. The EBST stimulated innate pro inflammatory response (TNFα) and maturation (MHC-II, CD40, CD80 and CD86) of DC. Immuno-stimulatory potential of EBST was on par with both a commercial Salmonella vaccine, and live Salmonella cells. The EBST cells did not multiply under permissive in vitro and in vivo conditions. However, EBST cells remained metabolically active. EBST immunized mice developed Salmonella-specific CD4+ T-cells that produced the Th1 cytokine IFNγ at a level similar to that induced by the live attenuated vaccine (AroA- ST) formulation. The EBST retained stable immunogenic properties for several months at room temperature, 4°C, and -20°C as well as after lyophilization. Therefore, such eBeam-based immune modulators have potential as vaccine candidates since they offer the safety of a "killed" vaccine, while retaining the immunogenicity of an "attenuated" vaccine. The ability to store eBeam based immune modulators at room temperature without loss of potency is also noteworthy.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCells, CulturedCytokinesDendritic CellsElectronsFemaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSalmonella Infections, AnimalSalmonella typhimuriumSalmonella VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, InactivatedCytokinesSalmonella VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID33861743
PMCPMC8051754
OpenAlexW3153580926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.