Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33861721›Full record

ReviewGenes & development2021

Genetic basis of chemical communication in eusocial insects.

Hua Yan, Jürgen Liebig

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & development, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Complex Roles of Insect Cytochrome P450s in Chemical Adaptation.International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Multi-Omics Analysis RevealsEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  7. Phenomenon of reproductive plasticity in ants.Current opinion in insect science · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Odorant Receptor Gene Family inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hua YanDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.
Jürgen LiebigSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA.
Arizona State University · USTaste and Smell Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social behavior is one of the most fascinating and complex behaviors in humans and animals. A fundamental process of social behavior is communication among individuals. It relies on the capability of the nervous system to sense, process, and interpret various signals (e.g., pheromones) and respond with appropriate decisions and actions. Eusocial insects, including ants, some bees, some wasps, and termites, display intriguing cooperative social behavior. Recent advances in genetic and genomic studies have revealed key genes that are involved in pheromone synthesis, chemosensory perception, and physiological and behavioral responses to varied pheromones. In this review, we highlight the genes and pathways that regulate queen pheromone-mediated social communication, discuss the evolutionary changes in genetic systems, and outline prospects of functional studies in sociobiology.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationAnimalsBehavior, AnimalInsectaPheromonesSensationSocial BehaviorPheromoneschemosensory systemcommunicationgenetic regulationpheromonesignal evolutionsocial behavior

Identifiers

PMID33861721
PMCPMC8015721
OpenAlexW3145947710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.