Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33861719›Full record

ReviewGenes & development2021

Mutant p53 in cell-cell interactions.

Steven Pilley, Tristan A Rodriguez, Karen H Vousden

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & development, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. In Silico Analysis of Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Frustration in physiology and molecular medicine.Molecular aspects of medicine · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven PilleyThe Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, United Kingdom.
Tristan A RodriguezNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3415-8493
Karen H VousdenThe Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, United Kingdom.
The Francis Crick Institute · GBHammersmith Hospital · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S008284/1Cancer Research UK C596/A26855Medical Research Council MR/T028637/1Wellcome Trust FC001557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

p53 is an important tumor suppressor, and the complexities of p53 function in regulating cancer cell behaviour are well established. Many cancers lose or express mutant forms of p53, with evidence that the type of alteration affecting p53 may differentially impact cancer development and progression. It is also clear that in addition to cell-autonomous functions, p53 status also affects the way cancer cells interact with each other. In this review, we briefly examine the impact of different p53 mutations and focus on how heterogeneity of p53 status can affect relationships between cells within a tumor.

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisCell CommunicationCell CompetitionEmbryonic DevelopmentHumansMutationNeoplasmsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor Protein p53cancercell-cell interactionscell competitionmutant p53

Identifiers

PMID33861719
PMCPMC8015724
OpenAlexW3149405272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.