Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33861538›Full record

ReviewInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Pelvic lymph node dissection in high-risk prostate cancer.

Luciano Haiquel, Xavier Cathelineau, Rafael Sanchez-Salas, Petr Macek, Fernando Secin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Node dissection in prostate cancer: no answers for old questions.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luciano HaiquelDepartment of Urology, Sanatorio Las Lomas de San Isidro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Xavier CathelineauDepartment of Urology, L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Rafael Sanchez-SalasDepartment of Urology, L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Petr MacekDepartment of Urology, L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Fernando SecinDiscipline of Urology, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe therapeutic role of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in prostate cancer (PCa) is unknown due to absence of randomized trials.

objectiveto present a critical review on the therapeutic benefits of PLND in high risk localized PCa patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsA search of the literature on PLND was performed using PubMed, Cochrane, and Medline database. Articles obtained regarding diagnostic imaging and sentinel lymph node dissection, PLND extension, impact of PLND on survival, PLND in node positive "only" disease and PLND surgical risks were critically reviewed.

resultsHigh-risk PCa commonly develops metastases. In these patients, the possibility of presenting lymph node disease is high. Thus, extended PLND during radical prostatectomy may be recommended in selected patients with localized high-risk PCa for both accurate staging and therapeutic intent. Although recent advances in detecting patients with lymph node involvement (LNI) with novel imaging and sentinel node dissection, extended PLND continues to be the most accurate method to stage lymph node disease, which may be related to the number of nodes removed. However, extended PLND increases surgical time, with potential impact on perioperative complications, hospital length of stay, rehospitalization and healthcare costs. Controversy persists on its therapeutic benefit, particularly in patients with high node burden.

conclusionThe impact of PLND on biochemical recurrence and PCa survival is unclear yet. Selection of patients may benefit from extended PLND but the challenge remains to identify them accurately. Only prospective randomized study would answer the precise role of PLND in high-risk pelvis confined PCa patients.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionProstatic NeoplasmsHumansLymph NodesMalePelvisProspective StudiesProstatectomyLymphLymph Node ExcisionProstate cancer, familial [Supplementary Concept]

Identifiers

PMID33861538
PMCPMC8691250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.