Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33861399›Full record

ReviewAmbio2021

Sustainability of wild plant use in the Andean Community of South America.

Laura Kor, Katherine Homewood, Terence P Dawson, Mauricio Diazgranados

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ambio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura KorNatural Capital and Plant Health Department, The Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, TW9 3AE, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4244-960X
Katherine HomewoodAnthropology Department, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Terence P DawsonDepartment of Geography, Bush House NE, King's College London, London, WC2B 4BG, UK.
Mauricio DiazgranadosNatural Capital and Plant Health Department, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Wakehurst Place, Ardingly, RH17 6TN, UK. m.diazgranados@kew.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0448-5706

Funding

Natural Environment Research Council NE/S007229/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overexploitation is the second biggest driver of global plant extinction. Meanwhile, useful plant species are vital to livelihoods across the world, with global conservation efforts increasingly applying the concept of 'conservation-through-use.' However, successfully balancing conservation and biodiversity use remains challenging. We reviewed literature on the sustainability of wild-collected plant use across the countries of Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia-a region of global importance for its biological and cultural richness. After applying defined search terms and a two-stage screening process, 68 articles were reviewed. The numbers which reported sustainable, unsustainable, or context-dependent outcomes were relatively even, but national differences emerged. Through narrative synthesis, we identified five key, reoccurring themes: plant biology; land tenure; knowledge, resource, and capacity; economics and market pressures; and institutional structures, policy, and legislation. Our results show the need for flexible, context-specific approaches and the importance of collaboration, with bottom-up management and conservation methods involving local communities and traditional ecological knowledge often proving most effective.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEthnobotanyBoliviaEcuadorPeruSouth AmericaConservation-through-useEthnobotanyNatural resource useNTFPPlant conservationUseful plants

Identifiers

PMID33861399
PMCPMC8285437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.