Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33861202›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2021

Preparing Patients and Clinicians for Open Notes in Mental Health: Qualitative Inquiry of International Experts.

Charlotte Blease, John Torous, Anna Kharko, Catherine M DesRoches, Kendall Harcourt, Stephen O'Neill, Liz Salmi, Deborah Wachenheim, Maria Hägglund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Shifting Mindsets: The Impact of a Patient Portal on Functioning and Recovery in a Mental Health Setting.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Charlotte BleaseDivision of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0205-1165
John TorousDepartment of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5362-7937
Anna KharkoSchool of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-6173
Catherine M DesRochesDivision of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5373-855X
Kendall HarcourtDivision of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7185-014X
Stephen O'NeillDivision of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5216-6841
Liz SalmiDivision of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3798-7438
Deborah WachenheimDivision of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9303-8910
Maria HägglundDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6839-3651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a growing number of countries worldwide, clinicians are sharing mental health notes, including psychiatry and psychotherapy notes, with patients.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to solicit the views of experts on provider policies and patient and clinician training or guidance in relation to open notes in mental health care.

methodsIn August 2020, we conducted a web-based survey of international experts on the practice of sharing mental health notes. Experts were identified as informaticians, clinicians, chief medical information officers, patients, and patient advocates who have extensive research knowledge about or experience of providing access to or having access to mental health notes. This study undertook a qualitative descriptive analysis of experts' written responses and opinions (comments) to open-ended questions on training clinicians, patient guidance, and suggested policy regulations.

resultsA total of 70 of 92 (76%) experts from 6 countries responded. We identified four major themes related to opening mental health notes to patients: the need for clarity about provider policies on exemptions, providing patients with basic information about open notes, clinician training in writing mental health notes, and managing patient-clinician disagreement about mental health notes.

conclusionsThis study provides timely information on policy and training recommendations derived from a wide range of international experts on how to prepare clinicians and patients for open notes in mental health. The results of this study point to the need for further refinement of exemption policies in relation to sharing mental health notes, guidance for patients, and curricular changes for students and clinicians as well as improvements aimed at enhancing patient and clinician-friendly portal design.

Indexed as

attitudeselectronic health recordsmental healthmobile phoneopen notespsychiatrypsychotherapyqualitative researchsurvey

Identifiers

PMID33861202
PMCPMC8087962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.