ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021
Real-Time Clinical Decision Support Based on Recurrent Neural Networks for In-Hospital Acute Kidney Injury: External Validation and Model Interpretation.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review of externally validated machine learning models for predicting acute kidney injury in general hospital patients.Frontiers in nephrology · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Artificial intelligence in nephrology: predicting CKD progression and personalizing treatment.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- Development and validation of clinical prediction models for personalized renal function monitoring in people with heart failure in primary care: the RENAL-HF study protocol.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Predicting Acute Kidney Injury with Nephrotoxic Burden in Noncritical Patients: An Internal and External Validation Study.Kidney360 · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Models for Point-of-Care Diagnostics of Acute Kidney Injury.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Acute Kidney Injury Risk Classification.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025Article
- Prediction of Moderate-to-Severe Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Using a Dual-Timepoint Machine Learning Model: Development, Multiregional Validation, and Clinical Deployment Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a real-time risk prediction model for acute kidney injury in hospitalized pediatric patients.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2025Article
- An algorithm to assess importance of predictors in systematic reviews of prediction models: a case study with simulations.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- A Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Multicenter Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Machine learning approaches toward an understanding of acute kidney injury: current trends and future directions.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2024Review
- Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Clinical Decision Support Systems and Care Delivery.Journal of medical systems · 2024Review
- Time series forecasting of weight for diuretic dose adjustment using bidirectional long short-term memory.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Time Series AI Model for Acute Kidney Injury Detection Based on a Multicenter Distributed Research Network: Development and Verification Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Development and external validation of a machine learning model for the prediction of persistent acute kidney injury stage 3 in multi-centric, multi-national intensive care cohorts.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- Mapping the Bibliometrics Landscape of AI in Medicine: Methodological Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Xanthohumol attenuates renal ischemia/reperfusion injury by inhibiting ferroptosis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Article
- Requirements for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence and its Application in Healthcare.Healthcare informatics research · 2023Article
- Assessment of Prediction Tasks and Time Window Selection in Temporal Modeling of Electronic Health Record Data: a Systematic Review.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is commonly encountered in clinical practice and is associated with poor patient outcomes and increased health care costs. Despite it posing significant challenges for clinicians, effective measures for AKI prediction and prevention are lacking. Previously published AKI prediction models mostly have a simple design without external validation. Furthermore, little is known about the process of linking model output and clinical decisions due to the black-box nature of neural network models.
objectiveWe aimed to present an externally validated recurrent neural network (RNN)-based continuous prediction model for in-hospital AKI and show applicable model interpretations in relation to clinical decision support.
methodsStudy populations were all patients aged 18 years or older who were hospitalized for more than 48 hours between 2013 and 2017 in 2 tertiary hospitals in Korea (Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and Seoul National University Hospital). All demographic data, laboratory values, vital signs, and clinical conditions of patients were obtained from electronic health records of each hospital. We developed 2-stage hierarchical prediction models (model 1 and model 2) using RNN algorithms. The outcome variable for model 1 was the occurrence of AKI within 7 days from the present. Model 2 predicted the future trajectory of creatinine values up to 72 hours. The performance of each developed model was evaluated using the internal and external validation data sets. For the explainability of our models, different model-agnostic interpretation methods were used, including Shapley Additive Explanations, partial dependence plots, individual conditional expectation, and accumulated local effects plots.
resultsWe included 69,081 patients in the training, 7675 in the internal validation, and 72,352 in the external validation cohorts for model development after excluding cases with missing data and those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 or end-stage kidney disease. Model 1 predicted any AKI development with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.88 (internal validation) and 0.84 (external validation), and stage 2 or higher AKI development with an AUC of 0.93 (internal validation) and 0.90 (external validation). Model 2 predicted the future creatinine values within 3 days with mean-squared errors of 0.04-0.09 for patients with higher risks of AKI and 0.03-0.08 for those with lower risks. Based on the developed models, we showed AKI probability according to feature values in total patients and each individual with partial dependence, accumulated local effects, and individual conditional expectation plots. We also estimated the effects of feature modifications such as nephrotoxic drug discontinuation on future creatinine levels.
conclusionsWe developed and externally validated a continuous AKI prediction model using RNN algorithms. Our model could provide real-time assessment of future AKI occurrences and individualized risk factors for AKI in general inpatient cohorts; thus, we suggest approaches to support clinical decisions based on prediction models for in-hospital AKI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.