Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33861047›Full record

ReviewAnesthesia and analgesia2021

The Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Interdisciplinary Consensus Statement on Neuraxial Procedures in Obstetric Patients With Thrombocytopenia.

Melissa E Bauer, Katherine Arendt, Yaakov Beilin, Terry Gernsheimer, Juliana Perez Botero, Andra H James, Edward Yaghmour, Roulhac D Toledano, Mark Turrentine, Timothy Houle and 8 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
19.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. A practical approach to immune thrombocytopenia in pregnancy.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa E BauerFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Katherine ArendtDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Yaakov BeilinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Terry GernsheimerDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Juliana Perez BoteroDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin and Versiti, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Andra H JamesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Edward YaghmourDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Roulhac D ToledanoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York.
Mark TurrentineDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, Liaison for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Timothy HouleDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mark MacEachernTaubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Hannah MaddenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anita RajasekharDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Scott SegalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Christopher WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Jason P CooperDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Ruth LandauDepartment of Anesthesiology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Lisa LeffertDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Washington · USBaylor College of Medicine · USColumbia University · USDuke University · USHospital for Special Surgery · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMayo Clinic · USNYU Langone Health · USVanderbilt University · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN HEMATOLOGYT32HL007093 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Janis L Abkowitz · 1985 to 2026
$13.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because up to 12% of obstetric patients meet criteria for the diagnosis of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy, it is not infrequent that the anesthesiologist must decide whether to proceed with a neuraxial procedure in an affected patient. Given the potential morbidity associated with general anesthesia for cesarean delivery, thoughtful consideration of which patients with thrombocytopenia are likely to have an increased risk of spinal epidural hematoma with neuraxial procedures, and when these risks outweigh the relative benefits is important to consider and to inform shared decision making with patients. Because there are substantial risks associated with withholding a neuraxial analgesic/anesthetic procedure in obstetric patients, every effort should be made to perform a bleeding history assessment and determine the thrombocytopenia etiology before admission for delivery. Whereas multiple other professional societies (obstetric, interventional pain, and hematologic) have published guidelines addressing platelet thresholds for safe neuraxial procedures, the US anesthesia professional societies have been silent on this topic. Despite a paucity of high-quality data, there are now meta-analyses that provide better estimations of risks. An interdisciplinary taskforce was convened to unite the relevant professional societies, synthesize the data, and provide a practical decision algorithm to help inform risk-benefit discussions and shared decision making with patients. Through a systematic review and modified Delphi process, the taskforce concluded that the best available evidence indicates the risk of spinal epidural hematoma associated with a platelet count ≥70,000 × 106/L is likely to be very low in obstetric patients with thrombocytopenia secondary to gestational thrombocytopenia, immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the absence of other risk factors. Ultimately, the decision of whether to proceed with a neuraxial procedure in an obstetric patient with thrombocytopenia occurs within a clinical context. Potentially relevant factors include, but are not limited to, patient comorbidities, obstetric risk factors, airway examination, available airway equipment, risk of general anesthesia, and patient preference.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesAnesthesia, ObstetricalFemaleHumansPerinatologyPregnancySocieties, MedicalThrombocytopenia

Identifiers

PMID33861047
PMCPMC13109829
OpenAlexW3131830035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.