Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33860831›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Quantitative CT radiomics-based models for prediction of haematoma expansion and poor functional outcome in primary intracerebral haemorrhage.

Stefan Pszczolkowski, José P Manzano-Patrón, Zhe K Law, Kailash Krishnan, Azlinawati Ali, Philip M Bath, Nikola Sprigg, Rob A Dineen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05424614 (Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05424614 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research

TypeobservationalSponsorBeijing Neurosurgical InstituteRan2022 to 2024Enrolled150ConditionsCerebral Hemorrhage, Prognosis, Artificial IntelligenceArmsFunctional outcome follow-up of patients
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stefan PszczolkowskiRadiological Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Precision Imaging Beacon, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. mszspp@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5859-3190
José P Manzano-PatrónRadiological Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Precision Imaging Beacon, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0040-1926
Zhe K LawStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7900-9037
Kailash KrishnanStroke, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6486-3783
Azlinawati AliStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Philip M BathStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2734-5132
Nikola SpriggStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5871-8168
Rob A DineenRadiological Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Precision Imaging Beacon, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9523-2546

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/14/96/31262Health Technology Assessment Programme 11_129_109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo test radiomics-based features extracted from noncontrast CT of patients with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage for prediction of haematoma expansion and poor functional outcome and compare them with radiological signs and clinical factors. MATERIALS AND

methodsSeven hundred fifty-four radiomics-based features were extracted from 1732 scans derived from the TICH-2 multicentre clinical trial. Features were harmonised and a correlation-based feature selection was applied. Different elastic-net parameterisations were tested to assess the predictive performance of the selected radiomics-based features using grid optimisation. For comparison, the same procedure was run using radiological signs and clinical factors separately. Models trained with radiomics-based features combined with radiological signs or clinical factors were tested. Predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) score.

resultsThe optimal radiomics-based model showed an AUC of 0.693 for haematoma expansion and an AUC of 0.783 for poor functional outcome. Models with radiological signs alone yielded substantial reductions in sensitivity. Combining radiomics-based features and radiological signs did not provide any improvement over radiomics-based features alone. Models with clinical factors had similar performance compared to using radiomics-based features, albeit with low sensitivity for haematoma expansion. Performance of radiomics-based features was boosted by incorporating clinical factors, with time from onset to scan and age being the most important contributors for haematoma expansion and poor functional outcome prediction, respectively.

conclusionRadiomics-based features perform better than radiological signs and similarly to clinical factors on the prediction of haematoma expansion and poor functional outcome. Moreover, combining radiomics-based features with clinical factors improves their performance. KEY POINTS: • Linear models based on CT radiomics-based features perform better than radiological signs on the prediction of haematoma expansion and poor functional outcome in the context of intracerebral haemorrhage. • Linear models based on CT radiomics-based features perform similarly to clinical factors known to be good predictors. However, combining these clinical factors with radiomics-based features increases their predictive performance.

Indexed as

HematomaTomography, X-Ray ComputedCerebral HemorrhageHumansROC CurveCerebral parenchymal hemorrhageLinear modelsPredictive medicineRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID33860831
PMCPMC8452575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.