Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33860813›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2021

Intrapartum pudendal nerve block analgesia and risk of postpartum urinary retention: a cohort study.

Åsa Henning Waldum, Anne Catherine Staff, Mirjam Lukasse, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Ingvil Krarup Sørbye, Anne Flem Jacobsen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Auricular bean embedding improves urination in epidural labor analgesia: A single center randomized controlled study.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Åsa Henning WaldumDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway. awaldum@ous-hf.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1599-7854
Anne Catherine StaffDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway.
Mirjam LukasseInstitute of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Ragnhild Sørum FalkOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ingvil Krarup SørbyeDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway.
Anne Flem JacobsenDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisPudendal nerve block analgesia (PNB) is used as pain relief in the final stage of childbirth. We hypothesized that PNB is associated with higher rates of postpartum urinary retention.

methodsWe performed a cohort study among primiparous women with a singleton, cephalic vaginal birth at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. Women receiving PNB were included in the exposed group, while the subsequent woman giving birth without PNB was included in the unexposed group. We compared the likelihood of postpartum urinary retention, defined as catheterization within 3 h after birth. Logistic regression analysis stratified by mode of delivery was performed adjusting for epidural analgesia, episiotomy and birth unit.

resultsOf the 1007 included women, 499 were exposed to PNB and 508 were unexposed. In adjusted analyses, women exposed to PNB did not differ in likelihood of postpartum urinary retention compared to women unexposed to PNB in either spontaneous (odds ratio[OR]: 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-1.22) or instrumental (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.89-2.39) births. Furthermore, no differences between the groups were observed with excessive residual urine volume or catheterization after > 3 h.

conclusionsPNB was associated with neither risk of postpartum urinary retention nor excessive residual urine volume and is therefore unlikely to hamper future bladder function.

Indexed as

Analgesia, EpiduralPudendal NerveUrinary RetentionCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPainPostpartum PeriodPregnancyAnalgesiaDeliveryObstetricObstetricalPostpartum urinary retentionPudendal nerve block

Identifiers

PMID33860813
PMCPMC8418588
OpenAlexW3155871709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.