Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33860811›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2021

Full-thickness vascularized vaginal flap as the fixation point in the surgical treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.

Dmitry Shkarupa, Nikita Kubin, Olga Staroseltseva

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dmitry ShkarupaSaint Petersburg State University Hospital, 154, Fontanka Embankment, Saint Petersburg, 190103, Russia.
Nikita KubinSaint Petersburg State University Hospital, 154, Fontanka Embankment, Saint Petersburg, 190103, Russia. nikitakubin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5189-4639
Olga StaroseltsevaSaint Petersburg State University Hospital, 154, Fontanka Embankment, Saint Petersburg, 190103, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisPost-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse is quite frequent and at the same time a challenging surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

methodsOne of the most popular methods of treatment is sacrospinous fixation, including its mesh modification.

resultsDespite the high efficiency in the apical compartment, the incidence of the anterior compartment prolapse is quite high. Erosion remains an unsolved problem. A 44-year-old patient with grade IV post-hysterectomy prolapse underwent a sacrospinous fixation procedure with mesh according to the described technique. Surgery was performed successfully without complications. The duration of the operation was 40 min. A year after the operation, the recurrence of POP was not recorded in any compartments of the pelvic floor. It was possible to maintain the length of the vagina. Dyspareunia and vaginal erosion were not detected. The patient also noted a significant improvement in her quality of life.

conclusionThe demonstrated approach allows performing minimally invasive reconstruction of all three compartments of the pelvic floor. Moreover, the use of a full-thickness vascularized vaginal flap allows safely fixing the mesh to the vaginal vault, minimizing the risk of erosion and pain syndrome due to excessive tension.

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapseQuality of LifeAdultFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeVaginaPost-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapseSacrospinous fixationVascularized vaginal flapVideo tutorial apical sling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.