Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33860745›Full record

Observational studyPublic health nutrition2021

Soft drinks and premiums with children's meals marketed on the websites of the top restaurant chains worldwide.

Ameena Batada, Audrey E Thomas

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Public health nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ameena BatadaHealth and Wellness Department, University of North Carolina at Asheville, Rm 465, Sherrill Center, 1 University Heights, Asheville, NC28804, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4917-6878
Audrey E ThomasCAN Community Health, Columbia, SC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the frequency with which soft drinks and premiums are available with children's meals marketed on the top restaurant chains' websites worldwide.

designCross-sectional structured observational assessment of secondary information about top international restaurant chain children's meals.

settingWebsites of top restaurant chains for 193 countries and five regions of the United Nations.

participantsTop restaurant chains (including McDonald's, Subway, Burger King and KFC) across 193 countries. Children's meal images and descriptions were reviewed to determine if the meal was marketed with a soft drink as a beverage option and whether the meal offered a premium.

resultsChildren's meals were marketed online on restaurant websites by at least one of the four chains in a total of seventy eight of the 193 countries (40·4 %). Overall, 56·3 % of countries with any online children's meal marketing by the four chains included at least one chain that marketed soft drinks and 92·3 % marketed premiums with the meal.

conclusionsEvery region in the world includes marketing of children's meals on the websites of the top restaurant chains. The high prevalence of premiums marketed online with children's meals is of concern. Similarly, with over 50 % of countries with online children's meal marketing having at least one chain that offers soft drinks as part of the meals, additional regulation and education may be warranted.

Indexed as

Fast FoodsRestaurantsCarbonated BeveragesChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMealsChildren's mealsMarketing to childrenRestaurant meals

Identifiers

PMID33860745
PMCPMC10195263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.