Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33860592›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2021

Effects of an Interprofessional Communication Approach on Support Needs, Quality of Life, and Mood of Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer: A Randomized Trial.

Katja Krug, Jasmin Bossert, Nicole Deis, Johannes Krisam, Matthias Villalobos, Anja Siegle, Corinna Jung, Laura Hagelskamp, Laura Unsöld, Jana Jünger and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Palliative care interventions for thoracic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis identifying the core elements.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. ONC-Call: A Hands-On Workshop of Emergent Spine Radiation Therapy for Multidisciplinary Trainees.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Katja KrugDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9795-7954
Jasmin BossertDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6285-013X
Nicole DeisThoracic Clinic, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Johannes KrisamInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4092-7874
Matthias VillalobosThoracic Clinic, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8730-1134
Anja SiegleThoracic Clinic, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0164-9931
Corinna JungThoracic Clinic, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2814-2935
Laura HagelskampThoracic Clinic, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1283-3320
Laura UnsöldThoracic Clinic, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jana JüngerGerman National Institute for State Examinations in Medicine, Pharmacy, and Psychotherapy, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2391-6225
Michael ThomasThoracic Clinic, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michel WensingDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6569-8137

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo address the support needs of newly diagnosed patients with lung cancer with limited prognosis, the Milestone Communication Approach (MCA) was developed and implemented. The main elements of the MCA are situation-specific conversations along the disease trajectory conducted by an interprofessional tandem of physician and nurse. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of MCA on addressing support needs, quality of life, and mood as compared with standard oncological care. PATIENTS AND

methodsA randomized trial was conducted with baseline assessment and follow-up assessments at 3, 6, and 9 months in outpatients with newly diagnosed lung cancer stage IV at a German thoracic oncology hospital. The primary outcome was the Health System and Information Needs subscale of the Short Form Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF34-G) at 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the other subscales of the SCNS-SF34-G, the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy lung module, the Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression and Anxiety, and the Distress Thermometer.

resultsAt baseline, 174 patients were randomized, of whom 102 patients (MCA: n = 52; standard care: n = 50) provided data at 3-month follow-up. Patients of the MCA group reported lower information needs at 3-month follow-up (mean ± SD, 33.4 ± 27.5; standard care, 43.1 ± 29.9; p = .033). No effects were found for secondary outcomes.

conclusionMCA lowered patient-reported information needs but did not have other effects. MCA contributed to tailored communication because an adequate level of information and orientation set the basis for patient-centered care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: By addressing relevant issues at predefined times, the Milestone Communication Approach provides individual patient-centered care facilitating the timely integration of palliative care for patients with a limited prognosis. The needs of patients with lung cancer must be assessed and addressed throughout the disease trajectory. Although specific topics may be relevant for all patients, such as information about the disease and associated health care, situations of individual patients and their families must be considered. Additionally, using the short form of the Supportive Care Needs Survey in clinical practice to identify patients' problems might support individually targeted communication and preference-sensitive care.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsQuality of LifeCommunicationHumansPalliative CareSurveys and QuestionnairesCommunicationLung cancerNeedsQuality of lifeSupport

Identifiers

PMID33860592
PMCPMC8342586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.