Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33860504›Full record

SynthesisRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2021

Vertical Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review.

Ionara Diniz Evangelista Santos Barcelos, Ivan Andrade de Araújo Penna, Adriana de Góes Soligo, Zelma Bernardes Costa, Wellington Paula Martins

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ionara Diniz Evangelista Santos BarcelosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Cascavel, Paraná, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3120-9571
Ivan Andrade de Araújo PennaDepartment of Maternal-Infant Care, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0283-3914
Adriana de Góes SoligoPrivate Clinic of Human Reproduction Dra. Adriana de Góes, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7910-8572
Zelma Bernardes CostaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8888-0847
Wellington Paula MartinsSEMEAR Fertilidade, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7593-5607
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe evaluation of the available evidence on vertical transmission by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV)-2. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search was performed on June 13, 2020 on the Embase, PubMed and Scopus databases using the following search terms: ( SELECTION OF STUDIES: The electronic search resulted in a total of 2,073 records. Titles and abstracts were reviewed by two authors (WPM, IDESB), who checked for duplicates using the pre-established criteria for screening (studies published in English without limitation regarding the date or the status of the publication). DATA COLLECTION: Data extraction was performed in a standardized way, and the final eligibility was assessed by reading the full text of the articles. We retrieved data regarding the delivery of the potential cases of vertical transmission, as well as the main findings and conclusions of systematic reviews. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 2,073 records were reviewed; 1,000 duplicates and 896 clearly not eligible records were excluded. We evaluated the full text of 177 records, and identified only 9 suspected cases of possible vertical transmission. The only case with sufficient evidence of vertical transmission was reported in France.

conclusionThe risk of vertical transmission by SARS-CoV-2 is probably very low. Despite several thousands of affected pregnant women, we have identified only one case that has fulfilled sufficient criteria to be confirmed as a case of vertical transmission. Well-designed observational studies evaluating large samples are still necessary to determine the risk of vertical transmission depending on the gestational age at infection.

Indexed as

Infectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPregnancy Complications, InfectiousCOVID-19FemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRisk

Identifiers

PMID33860504
PMCPMC10183886
OpenAlexW3153551456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.