Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33860501›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2021

Awareness about Vulvovaginal Aesthetics Procedures among Medical Students and Health Professionals in Saudi Arabia.

Shazia Iqbal, Khalid Akkour, Bushra Bano, Ghaiath Hussain, Manal Khalid Kamal Ali Elhelow, Atheer Mansour Al-Mutairi, Balqees Sami Khaza'l Aljasim

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Shazia IqbalAlfarabi College of Medicine Riyadh, Alfarabi, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4890-5864
Khalid AkkourKing Saud University, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6302-5609
Bushra BanoAllama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-2025-3649
Ghaiath HussainBirmingham University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3325-5651
Manal Khalid Kamal Ali ElhelowDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Alfarabi College of Medicine, Alfarabi, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9565-5971
Atheer Mansour Al-MutairiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Alfarabi College of Medicine, Alfarabi, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4829-4004
Balqees Sami Khaza'l AljasimDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Alfarabi College of Medicine, Alfarabi, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8821-2275
Alfaisal University · SAAllama Iqbal Medical College · PKKing Saud University · SAUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present study aimed to explore the opinion and ethical consideration of vulvovaginal aesthetics procedures (VVAPs) among health professionals and medical students in Saudi Arabia.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional study performed between January 2020 and April 2020. Data was collected through electronic media, WhatsApp, and emails. The results were analyzed by applying the Students t-test, and correlations were considered significant if they presented a p-value < 0.05.

resultsThere is significant demand to educate doctors, health professionals, medical students, and gynecologists for the VVAPs to have a solid foundation, justified indications, and knowledge about various aesthetic options. Although female doctors, medical students, young doctors, and gynecologists have more knowledge about VVAPs, all health professionals ought to be aware of recent trends in vulvovaginal aesthetics (VVA). The present analysis determined that VVA should be under the domain of gynecologists, rather than under that of plastic surgeons, general surgeons, and cosmetologists. The majority of the participants considered that vaginal rejuvenation, "G-spot" augmentation, clitoral surgery, and hymenoplasty are not justifiable on medical grounds.

conclusionThe decision to opt for different techniques for vaginal tightening and revitalization should be taken very carefully, utilizing the shared decision-making approach. Ethical aspects and moral considerations are important key factors before embarking in the VVAPs purely for cosmetic reasons. Further research is required to determine the sexual, psychological, and body image outcomes for women who underwent elective VVAPs. Moreover, medical educators must consider VVAPs as part of the undergraduate and postgraduate medical curriculum.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPractice Patterns, Physicians'Students, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleGynecologyHumansMiddle AgedRejuvenationSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesVaginaVulvaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33860501
PMCPMC10183919
OpenAlexW3156617398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.