Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33860454›Full record

ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2021

Mesenchymal Stromal Cells from Different Parts of Umbilical Cord: Approach to Comparison & Characteristics.

Ekaterina Semenova, Mariusz P Grudniak, Eugeniusz K Machaj, Katarzyna Bocian, Magdalena Chroscinska-Krawczyk, Marzena Trochonowicz, Igor M Stepaniec, Magdalena Murzyn, Karolina E Zagorska, Dariusz Boruczkowski and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ekaterina SemenovaResearch and Development Department, Polish Stem Cell Bank, FamiCord Group, Ul. Jana Pawla II 29, 00-867, Warsaw, Poland.
Mariusz P GrudniakResearch and Development Department, Polish Stem Cell Bank, FamiCord Group, Ul. Jana Pawla II 29, 00-867, Warsaw, Poland.
Eugeniusz K MachajResearch and Development Department, Polish Stem Cell Bank, FamiCord Group, Ul. Jana Pawla II 29, 00-867, Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna BocianResearch and Development Department, Polish Stem Cell Bank, FamiCord Group, Ul. Jana Pawla II 29, 00-867, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena Chroscinska-KrawczykClinic of Paediatric Neurology, III Faculty of Paediatrics, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Marzena TrochonowiczResearch and Development Department, Polish Stem Cell Bank, FamiCord Group, Ul. Jana Pawla II 29, 00-867, Warsaw, Poland.
Igor M StepaniecResearch and Development Department, Polish Stem Cell Bank, FamiCord Group, Ul. Jana Pawla II 29, 00-867, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena MurzynResearch and Development Department, Polish Stem Cell Bank, FamiCord Group, Ul. Jana Pawla II 29, 00-867, Warsaw, Poland.
Karolina E ZagorskaResearch and Development Department, Polish Stem Cell Bank, FamiCord Group, Ul. Jana Pawla II 29, 00-867, Warsaw, Poland.
Dariusz BoruczkowskiResearch and Development Department, Polish Stem Cell Bank, FamiCord Group, Ul. Jana Pawla II 29, 00-867, Warsaw, Poland.
Tomasz J KolanowskiResearch and Development Department, Polish Stem Cell Bank, FamiCord Group, Ul. Jana Pawla II 29, 00-867, Warsaw, Poland.
Tomasz OldakResearch and Development Department, Polish Stem Cell Bank, FamiCord Group, Ul. Jana Pawla II 29, 00-867, Warsaw, Poland. Tomasz.Oldak@pbkm.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-9958-6755
Natalia RozwadowskaInstitute of Human Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Polish Stem Cell Bank · PLInstitute of Human Genetics · PLMedical University of Lublin · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) are a unique population of cells that play an important role in the regeneration potential of the body. MSCs exhibit a characteristic phenotype and are capable of modulating the immune response. MSCs can be isolated from various tissues such as: bone marrow, adipose tissue, placenta, umbilical cord and others. The umbilical cord as a source of MSCs, has strong advantages, such as no-risk procedure of tissue retrieval after birth and easiness of the MSCs isolation. As the umbilical cord (UC) is a complex organ and we decided to evaluate, whether the cells derived from different regions of umbilical cord show similar or distinct properties. In this study we characterized and compared MSCs from three regions of the umbilical cord: Wharton's Jelly (WJ), the perivascular space (PRV) and the umbilical membrane (UCM). The analysis was carried out in terms of morphology, phenotype, immunomodulation potential and secretome. Based on the obtained results, we were able to conclude, that MSCs derived from distinct UC regions differ in their properties. According to our result WJ-MSCs have high and stabile proliferation potential and phenotype, when compare with other MSCs and can be treated as a preferable source of cells for medical application.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsUmbilical CordCell ProliferationFemaleHumansImmunomodulationPregnancyWharton JellyMesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs)MSCs from perivascular region (PRV)MSCs from UC membrane (UCM)Umbilical cord (UC)Wharton’s Jelly (WJ)

Identifiers

PMID33860454
PMCPMC8553697
OpenAlexW3152503528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.