Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33860387›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2021

Prosigna test in breast cancer: real-life experience.

D Hequet, G Harrissart, D Krief, L Maumy, F Lerebours, E Menet, C Callens, R Rouzier

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02813317 completednot on this map

Optimizing the Care Pathways of Patients Treated for Operable Breast Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorInstitut CurieRan2014 to 2017Enrolled617ConditionsBreast Cancer, Surgery
NCT07617025 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Prognostic and Predictive Role of Intrinsic Molecular Subtypes in BRCA-associated Breast Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorAngela TossRan2024 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsBreast Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D HequetDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, St Cloud, France. Delphine.hequet@curie.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8926-5651
G HarrissartDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, St Cloud, France.
D KriefDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, St Cloud, France.
L MaumyDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, St Cloud, France.
F LereboursDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, St Cloud, France.
E MenetDepartment of Pathology, Institut Curie, St Cloud, France.
C CallensPharmacogenomics Unit, Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
R RouzierDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, St Cloud, France.
Institut Curie · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGenomic tests can guide the decision to administer adjuvant chemotherapy in women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, Human Epidermal growth Factor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer (BC) at intermediate risk of recurrence. We assessed the decision-making and economic impact of the Prosigna test in a real-life setting.

methodsRetrospective cohort study of HR + , HER2- BC patients managed from 2016 to 2020, potential candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy, at intermediate risk of recurrence, in whom a Prosigna test was performed according to contemporary guidelines. The additional cost of chemotherapy over one year in terms of direct medical and non-medical costs was estimated in this study to be €9,737 (derived from a previous study, NCT02813317). The cost of the Prosigna test, as defined by the reimbursement system, was €1,849.

resultsAmong the 809 patients included in this study, 2.3 Prosigna tests had to be performed to avoid adjuvant chemotherapy for one patient. The number of tests that had to be performed to avoid chemotherapy for one patient was higher for patients with grade 3 tumors and pN1mic axillary node involvement and lower for grade 1 tumors or in the absence of axillary node involvement (pN0), but did not vary according to the 10-year overall survival gain predicted by the Predict online test. The cost saving related to withholding of adjuvant chemotherapy for one patient on the basis of the Prosigna test results was €5,485.

conclusionWe present one of the largest cohorts of HR + , HER2- BC patients at intermediate risk of recurrence, in whom a Prosigna test was used to guide the adjuvant therapy decision in a real-life setting, resulting in a 44% decrease in the indication for chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsClinical Decision-MakingChemotherapy, AdjuvantCosts and Cost AnalysisErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalObservational Studies as TopicRetrospective StudiesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesBreast cancerCost savingDecision impactGenomic test

Identifiers

PMID33860387
OpenAlexW3154054807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.